New Results on Multipath Routing
Michał Pióro, S. Mohanraj, Deep Medhi, Xuan Liu
Abstract
Michał Pióro, S. Mohanraj, Deep Medhi, Xuan Liu
Abstract
Multipath routing of traffic demands, known also as bifurcated routing or load sharing, has been studied for various telecommunication networks for a long time. An advantage of multipath routing is that it gives a demand the opportunity to use multiple paths through the network to send its traffic. In a single-commodity situation, this benefit can be clearly seen. When multiple demands (multi-commodity situation) compete for the same resources in a network, we focus on the problem of how many demands can take real advantage of multiple paths. In this context, we present new results on multipath routing for a number of network traffic objectives. We show that under certain traffic conditions and topological structures, multipath routing provides virtually no gain compared to single-path routing when the traffic is offered for all demand pairs in a network. We also present results on how different network objectives influence the ability of taking advantage of multipath routing. Our results, based on the basic properties of linear programming, are somewhat against a rather common belief (expressed by the term ”load sharing”) that multipath routing is significantly more effective in carrying traffic than single-path routing.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Multipath routing of traffic demands, known also as bifurcated routing or load sharing, has been studied for various telecommunication networks for a long time. An advantage of multipath routing is that it gives a demand the opportunity to use multiple paths through the network to send its traffic. In a single-commodity situation, this benefit can be clearly seen. When multiple demands (multi-commodity situation) compete for the same resources in a network, we focus on the problem of how many demands can take real advantage of multiple paths. In this context, we present new results on multipath routing for a number of network traffic objectives. We show that under certain traffic conditions and topological structures, multipath routing provides virtually no gain compared to single-path routing when the traffic is offered for all demand pairs in a network. We also present results on how different network objectives influence the ability of taking advantage of multipath routing. Our results, based on the basic properties of linear programming, are somewhat against a rather common belief (expressed by the term ”load sharing”) that multipath routing is significantly more effective in carrying traffic than single-path routing.
Key concepts: Multipath routing, Static routing, Computer network, Computer science, Equal-cost multi-path routing, Dynamic Source Routing, Policy-based routing, Link-state routing protocol