1981Unpublished venueRequires access

ANALYSIS OF ROUTINE TRAFFIC COUNT STATIONS TO OPTIMIZE LOCATIONS AND FREQUENCY

Sachin Shah, Johannes Hirschmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This report describes a grouping of statewide permanent and key traffic counters on the basis of their geographic variations in traffic flow. Several factors were considered including the distance between clusters and urban versus rural areas. Traffic counts for a 3-year period were grouped into clusters by highway functional class for each individual parish. A computer program examines the maximum distance within a cluster and the maximum, average, and minimum distances within and between clusters. Count stations are arranged in clusters or groups of comparatively like counts. The cluster groups were examined by reviewing Louisiana parish maps that show the station locations. A computerized cluster analysis of all districts for 1977-1979 was reviewed according to highway functional classes 6, 7, and 8. An indepth review of the various cluster arrangements indicated the possibility of estimating the average annual daily traffic at some locations from sample traffic counts. A total of 111 stations could be measured less frequently by subjectively reviewing the location and proximity of the 2,290 stations, whereas a total of 1,246 stations could be read less frequently based on the objective but insensitive computerized cluster analysis. This observation confirms the need for further analysis by taking into consideration factors such as seasonal variations, geographic distribution of stations, and the number of stations existing in each cluster.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report describes a grouping of statewide permanent and key traffic counters on the basis of their geographic variations in traffic flow. Several factors were considered including the distance between clusters and urban versus rural areas. Traffic counts for a 3-year period were grouped into clusters by highway functional class for each individual parish. A computer program examines the maximum distance within a cluster and the maximum, average, and minimum distances within and between clusters. Count stations are arranged in clusters or groups of comparatively like counts. The cluster groups were examined by reviewing Louisiana parish maps that show the station locations. A computerized cluster analysis of all districts for 1977-1979 was reviewed according to highway functional classes 6, 7, and 8. An indepth review of the various cluster arrangements indicated the possibility of estimating the average annual daily traffic at some locations from sample traffic counts. A total of 111 stations could be measured less frequently by subjectively reviewing the location and proximity of the 2,290 stations, whereas a total of 1,246 stations could be read less frequently based on the objective but insensitive computerized cluster analysis. This observation confirms the need for further analysis by taking into consideration factors such as seasonal variations, geographic distribution of stations, and the number of stations existing in each cluster.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report describes a grouping of statewide permanent and key traffic counters on the basis of their geographic variations in traffic flow. Several factors were considered including the distance between clusters and urban versus rural areas. Traffic counts for a 3-year period were grouped into clusters by highway functional class for each individual parish. A computer program examines the maximum distance within a cluster and the maximum, average, and minimum distances within and between clusters. Count stations are arranged in clusters or groups of comparatively like counts. The cluster groups were examined by reviewing Louisiana parish maps that show the station locations. A computerized cluster analysis of all districts for 1977-1979 was reviewed according to highway functional classes 6, 7, and 8. An indepth review of the various cluster arrangements indicated the possibility of estimating the average annual daily traffic at some locations from sample traffic counts. A total of 111 stations could be measured less frequently by subjectively reviewing the location and proximity of the 2,290 stations, whereas a total of 1,246 stations could be read less frequently based on the objective but insensitive computerized cluster analysis. This observation confirms the need for further analysis by taking into consideration factors such as seasonal variations, geographic distribution of stations, and the number of stations existing in each cluster.

Key concepts: Cluster (spacecraft), Geography, Sample (material), Traffic count, Statistics, Geographic information system, Cartography, Traffic volume

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ANALYSIS OF ROUTINE TRAFFIC COUNT STATIONS TO OPTIMIZE LOCATIONS AND FREQUENCY — Research Paper | ScholarLens