1975Unpublished venueRequires access

CURRENT STATE PRACTICES IN TRANSIT FUNDING

B O Bair, D J Mckelvey

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In an effort toward refining a funding method which results in efficient, effective and equitable transit service, this paper focuses on the criteria and methods adopted by the states for allocation of funds. Twenty-two states responded to a questionnaire concerning state assistance for mass transit. The states identified the purpose, modes, recipients, allocation formulas, funding sources and other relevant information. The survey found that: states use state funds as match for federal capital grants and assist in the purchase of other transit property; very few states have allocated state funds for the evaluation or promotion of mass transit service. The criteria for allocation of state funds vary considerably. The major distinction in funding is between that which is allocated to systems. Those of the latter type are primarily dependent upon whether the funds are intended for operating assistance or capital assistance. If states provide capital assistance to transportation systems, the proportion is usually 50 percent of the non-federal share. The allocation of funds for operating assistance is usually based upon the system's deficit or the systems performance. Very few states place requirements on the allocation of state funds. Seven different funding sources are identified and reviewed, and the goals and legislation governing funding are briefly discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In an effort toward refining a funding method which results in efficient, effective and equitable transit service, this paper focuses on the criteria and methods adopted by the states for allocation of funds. Twenty-two states responded to a questionnaire concerning state assistance for mass transit. The states identified the purpose, modes, recipients, allocation formulas, funding sources and other relevant information. The survey found that: states use state funds as match for federal capital grants and assist in the purchase of other transit property; very few states have allocated state funds for the evaluation or promotion of mass transit service. The criteria for allocation of state funds vary considerably. The major distinction in funding is between that which is allocated to systems. Those of the latter type are primarily dependent upon whether the funds are intended for operating assistance or capital assistance. If states provide capital assistance to transportation systems, the proportion is usually 50 percent of the non-federal share. The allocation of funds for operating assistance is usually based upon the system's deficit or the systems performance. Very few states place requirements on the allocation of state funds. Seven different funding sources are identified and reviewed, and the goals and legislation governing funding are briefly discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In an effort toward refining a funding method which results in efficient, effective and equitable transit service, this paper focuses on the criteria and methods adopted by the states for allocation of funds. Twenty-two states responded to a questionnaire concerning state assistance for mass transit. The states identified the purpose, modes, recipients, allocation formulas, funding sources and other relevant information. The survey found that: states use state funds as match for federal capital grants and assist in the purchase of other transit property; very few states have allocated state funds for the evaluation or promotion of mass transit service. The criteria for allocation of state funds vary considerably. The major distinction in funding is between that which is allocated to systems. Those of the latter type are primarily dependent upon whether the funds are intended for operating assistance or capital assistance. If states provide capital assistance to transportation systems, the proportion is usually 50 percent of the non-federal share. The allocation of funds for operating assistance is usually based upon the system's deficit or the systems performance. Very few states place requirements on the allocation of state funds. Seven different funding sources are identified and reviewed, and the goals and legislation governing funding are briefly discussed.

Key concepts: Legislation, Business, State (computer science), Capital (architecture), Service (business), Promotion (chess), Federal funds, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CURRENT STATE PRACTICES IN TRANSIT FUNDING — Research Paper | ScholarLens