2005Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing WorldRequires access

An assessment of seismic noise levels for the Advanced National Seismic System backbone network and selected regional broadband stations

Daniel E. McNamara, R. Buland, Harley Mitchell Benz, W.R. Leith

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this paper we assess the relative noise levels of 113 broadband seismic stations within the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) (netcode US), the Global Seismic Network (GSN) (netcodes II, IU) and several United States regional networks (netcodes CI, LB, UO, UW, NM). This assessment makes use of seismic power spectral data collected by a continuous noise monitoring system developed by the USGS-ANSS and the Incorporated Research Institutions in Seismology (IRIS) Data Management Center (DMC). We rank the stations relative to the Peterson Low noise model (LNM) (Peterson, 1993) for 11 different period bands. Results are listed in Appendix A. Results show that most regional stations rank low in all period bands. In general, stations in the US network have lower noise levels at short periods (0.0625-8.0 seconds), high frequencies (8.0-0.125Hz) while stations in the GSN network are quieter at long periods (16.0-128.0 seconds), low frequencies (0.03125-0.01563Hz). This result reflects the overall mission and objectives of each network.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we assess the relative noise levels of 113 broadband seismic stations within the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) (netcode US), the Global Seismic Network (GSN) (netcodes II, IU) and several United States regional networks (netcodes CI, LB, UO, UW, NM). This assessment makes use of seismic power spectral data collected by a continuous noise monitoring system developed by the USGS-ANSS and the Incorporated Research Institutions in Seismology (IRIS) Data Management Center (DMC). We rank the stations relative to the Peterson Low noise model (LNM) (Peterson, 1993) for 11 different period bands. Results are listed in Appendix A. Results show that most regional stations rank low in all period bands. In general, stations in the US network have lower noise levels at short periods (0.0625-8.0 seconds), high frequencies (8.0-0.125Hz) while stations in the GSN network are quieter at long periods (16.0-128.0 seconds), low frequencies (0.03125-0.01563Hz). This result reflects the overall mission and objectives of each network.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we assess the relative noise levels of 113 broadband seismic stations within the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) (netcode US), the Global Seismic Network (GSN) (netcodes II, IU) and several United States regional networks (netcodes CI, LB, UO, UW, NM). This assessment makes use of seismic power spectral data collected by a continuous noise monitoring system developed by the USGS-ANSS and the Incorporated Research Institutions in Seismology (IRIS) Data Management Center (DMC). We rank the stations relative to the Peterson Low noise model (LNM) (Peterson, 1993) for 11 different period bands. Results are listed in Appendix A. Results show that most regional stations rank low in all period bands. In general, stations in the US network have lower noise levels at short periods (0.0625-8.0 seconds), high frequencies (8.0-0.125Hz) while stations in the GSN network are quieter at long periods (16.0-128.0 seconds), low frequencies (0.03125-0.01563Hz). This result reflects the overall mission and objectives of each network.

Key concepts: Broadband, Geological survey, Noise (video), Seismic noise, Seismology, Geology, Environmental science, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An assessment of seismic noise levels for the Advanced National Seismic System backbone network and selected regional broadband stations — Research Paper | ScholarLens