Sacred place and sacred power: Conceptual boundaries and the marginalization of religious practices
Meredith B. McGuire
Abstract
Meredith B. McGuire
Abstract
In order to have a more thorough and nuanced understanding of religion and other cultural elements under the conditions of globalization, this chapter re-examines our concept of religion. To the extent that powerful organizations have controlled the boundaries of what would be accepted as real religion in modern societies, the effect has been the marginalization of many people’s religious practices. Sociology uses concepts, such as “religion”, “ritual”, “sacred”, “magic”, and “supernatural”, that frame our discourse and shape our images of what it is that we are studying. Each concept has a genealogy, traceable back to historical periods in which definitional boundaries were hotly disputed. This chapter examines one such historically contested boundary-the concept of “the sacred” and where it is located-in order to illustrate how fruitful it might be to rethink our concepts and images of religion and religious behavior. Keywords: marginalization; religious behavior; sacred power; sociology
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In order to have a more thorough and nuanced understanding of religion and other cultural elements under the conditions of globalization, this chapter re-examines our concept of religion. To the extent that powerful organizations have controlled the boundaries of what would be accepted as real religion in modern societies, the effect has been the marginalization of many people’s religious practices. Sociology uses concepts, such as “religion”, “ritual”, “sacred”, “magic”, and “supernatural”, that frame our discourse and shape our images of what it is that we are studying. Each concept has a genealogy, traceable back to historical periods in which definitional boundaries were hotly disputed. This chapter examines one such historically contested boundary-the concept of “the sacred” and where it is located-in order to illustrate how fruitful it might be to rethink our concepts and images of religion and religious behavior. Keywords: marginalization; religious behavior; sacred power; sociology
Key concepts: Power (physics), Aesthetics, Sociology, Art, Quantum mechanics, Physics