The Quadrennial Defense Review
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
For months, staffs have been busy preparing for the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) process. The QDR is expected to set out a new ‘Strategic Framework’ based four threat concepts. It will have to consider the following: whether current levels of US military activity constitutes a more or less manageable aberration or a new standard, requiring a commensurate planning response; how to align US forces to meet the four threats identified; how to address the dichotomy between military ‘transformation’ and meeting current replenishment needs; and how to reconcile budgetary tensions between outlays on equipment and personnel.
OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For months, staffs have been busy preparing for the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) process. The QDR is expected to set out a new ‘Strategic Framework’ based four threat concepts. It will have to consider the following: whether current levels of US military activity constitutes a more or less manageable aberration or a new standard, requiring a commensurate planning response; how to align US forces to meet the four threats identified; how to address the dichotomy between military ‘transformation’ and meeting current replenishment needs; and how to reconcile budgetary tensions between outlays on equipment and personnel.
Key concepts: Pentagon, Set (abstract data type), Process (computing), Operations research, Military personnel, Political science, Computer security, Law