1977Energy User News; (United States)Requires access

Co-generation: users interested, cautious

Morton Beiser

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Several studies have concluded that co-generation, an old process receiving renewed interest, offers large energy savings to individual companies and the nation as a whole. Dow Chemical's study estimated the savings available by producing electric power from waste streams and by pumping process steam from a central power station to industrial plants. According to Dow, the costs of building new generating facilities could be saved while maintaining consumption levels. Thermo Electron's study results were even more optimistic. In-plant power generation by either the bottoming or topping cycle are already in use in the paper, chemical, and petroleum refining industries, all of which are steam-intensive. Utilities, reluctant to buy power from plants for economic, supply, and regulatory reasons, may be encouraged by Carter's energy proposal to require the purchase but allow utilities to include capital costs in their rate base and claim income tax credits. A milder requirement for a case-by-case review of selling arrangements was suggested by Senator Hart of Colorado. Co-generation systems are recommended for plants paying over two cents per kWh, having a production capacity exceeding one megawatt, and operating a minimum of two shifts a day for five days. Optimum conditions would be a continuous operation. (DCK)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several studies have concluded that co-generation, an old process receiving renewed interest, offers large energy savings to individual companies and the nation as a whole. Dow Chemical's study estimated the savings available by producing electric power from waste streams and by pumping process steam from a central power station to industrial plants. According to Dow, the costs of building new generating facilities could be saved while maintaining consumption levels. Thermo Electron's study results were even more optimistic. In-plant power generation by either the bottoming or topping cycle are already in use in the paper, chemical, and petroleum refining industries, all of which are steam-intensive. Utilities, reluctant to buy power from plants for economic, supply, and regulatory reasons, may be encouraged by Carter's energy proposal to require the purchase but allow utilities to include capital costs in their rate base and claim income tax credits. A milder requirement for a case-by-case review of selling arrangements was suggested by Senator Hart of Colorado. Co-generation systems are recommended for plants paying over two cents per kWh, having a production capacity exceeding one megawatt, and operating a minimum of two shifts a day for five days. Optimum conditions would be a continuous operation. (DCK)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several studies have concluded that co-generation, an old process receiving renewed interest, offers large energy savings to individual companies and the nation as a whole. Dow Chemical's study estimated the savings available by producing electric power from waste streams and by pumping process steam from a central power station to industrial plants. According to Dow, the costs of building new generating facilities could be saved while maintaining consumption levels. Thermo Electron's study results were even more optimistic. In-plant power generation by either the bottoming or topping cycle are already in use in the paper, chemical, and petroleum refining industries, all of which are steam-intensive. Utilities, reluctant to buy power from plants for economic, supply, and regulatory reasons, may be encouraged by Carter's energy proposal to require the purchase but allow utilities to include capital costs in their rate base and claim income tax credits. A milder requirement for a case-by-case review of selling arrangements was suggested by Senator Hart of Colorado. Co-generation systems are recommended for plants paying over two cents per kWh, having a production capacity exceeding one megawatt, and operating a minimum of two shifts a day for five days. Optimum conditions would be a continuous operation. (DCK)

Key concepts: Electricity generation, Electricity, Combined cycle, Production (economics), Capital cost, Power station, Environmental economics, Consumption (sociology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Co-generation: users interested, cautious — Research Paper | ScholarLens