1986PubMedRequires access

Comparison of three types of reagents for detection of Bacteroides fragilis by direct immunofluorescence.

A Rokosz, F Meisel-Mikołajczyk, D Dzielska

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Three different methods were used to prepare conjugates for the detection of rods of the Bacteroides fragilis group by direct immunofluorescence. Lyophilized conjugates were prepared. Three sets (five in each) of monovalent conjugates against serotype strains of B. fragilis (including conjugate E/E1 + E2) and polyvalent conjugate (A + B + C + D + E1 + E2) were obtained. Each conjugate was prepared in two variants: 1. unabsorbed, 2. absorbed with tissue powder prior to lyophilization. Conjugates obtained by precipitation of sera with 50% ethanol and direct coupling of gammaglobulins with stain were found to meet the requirement for good fluorescence reagents and are well suited for the detection of B. fragilis by direct immunofluorescence. Absorption of the conjugates with tissue powder before lyophilization did not affect their quality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three different methods were used to prepare conjugates for the detection of rods of the Bacteroides fragilis group by direct immunofluorescence. Lyophilized conjugates were prepared. Three sets (five in each) of monovalent conjugates against serotype strains of B. fragilis (including conjugate E/E1 + E2) and polyvalent conjugate (A + B + C + D + E1 + E2) were obtained. Each conjugate was prepared in two variants: 1. unabsorbed, 2. absorbed with tissue powder prior to lyophilization. Conjugates obtained by precipitation of sera with 50% ethanol and direct coupling of gammaglobulins with stain were found to meet the requirement for good fluorescence reagents and are well suited for the detection of B. fragilis by direct immunofluorescence. Absorption of the conjugates with tissue powder before lyophilization did not affect their quality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three different methods were used to prepare conjugates for the detection of rods of the Bacteroides fragilis group by direct immunofluorescence. Lyophilized conjugates were prepared. Three sets (five in each) of monovalent conjugates against serotype strains of B. fragilis (including conjugate E/E1 + E2) and polyvalent conjugate (A + B + C + D + E1 + E2) were obtained. Each conjugate was prepared in two variants: 1. unabsorbed, 2. absorbed with tissue powder prior to lyophilization. Conjugates obtained by precipitation of sera with 50% ethanol and direct coupling of gammaglobulins with stain were found to meet the requirement for good fluorescence reagents and are well suited for the detection of B. fragilis by direct immunofluorescence. Absorption of the conjugates with tissue powder before lyophilization did not affect their quality.

Key concepts: Conjugate, Bacteroides fragilis, Immunofluorescence, Microbiology, Fluorescence, Chemistry, Chromatography, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of three types of reagents for detection of Bacteroides fragilis by direct immunofluorescence. — Research Paper | ScholarLens