1983Humana Press eBooksRequires access

Evaluating Codes of Professional Ethics

John Kultgen

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

My aim here is to develop a general strategy for evaluating codes of professional ethics. We will examine some provisions of the Code of Ethics of Engineers adopted by the Board of Directors of the Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD) in 1974. This code has been adopted, with modifications and in most cases sans the Guidelines provided by ECPD, by a majority of the engineering societies participating in the Council. 1 We will consider some of the strengths and weaknesses of the ECPD Code in comparison with other codes of professional ethics. We will not attempt to reach a final judgment on the merits of the Code because, as I will note, this would require empirical data that are not available at this time. Indeed, one byproduct of the discussion will be an indication of the empirical investigations that are needed to evaluate a code fairly. My critical remarks about the ECPD Code will be designed only to illustrate a strategy, not to carry it out all the way. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

My aim here is to develop a general strategy for evaluating codes of professional ethics. We will examine some provisions of the Code of Ethics of Engineers adopted by the Board of Directors of the Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD) in 1974. This code has been adopted, with modifications and in most cases sans the Guidelines provided by ECPD, by a majority of the engineering societies participating in the Council. 1 We will consider some of the strengths and weaknesses of the ECPD Code in comparison with other codes of professional ethics. We will not attempt to reach a final judgment on the merits of the Code because, as I will note, this would require empirical data that are not available at this time. Indeed, one byproduct of the discussion will be an indication of the empirical investigations that are needed to evaluate a code fairly. My critical remarks about the ECPD Code will be designed only to illustrate a strategy, not to carry it out all the way. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

My aim here is to develop a general strategy for evaluating codes of professional ethics. We will examine some provisions of the Code of Ethics of Engineers adopted by the Board of Directors of the Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD) in 1974. This code has been adopted, with modifications and in most cases sans the Guidelines provided by ECPD, by a majority of the engineering societies participating in the Council. 1 We will consider some of the strengths and weaknesses of the ECPD Code in comparison with other codes of professional ethics. We will not attempt to reach a final judgment on the merits of the Code because, as I will note, this would require empirical data that are not available at this time. Indeed, one byproduct of the discussion will be an indication of the empirical investigations that are needed to evaluate a code fairly. My critical remarks about the ECPD Code will be designed only to illustrate a strategy, not to carry it out all the way. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Ethical code, Engineering ethics, Professional ethics, Code (set theory), Strengths and weaknesses, Professional conduct, Information ethics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating Codes of Professional Ethics — Research Paper | ScholarLens