1993PubMedRequires access

Heparin monitoring during coronary intervention: activated clotting time versus activated partial thromboplastin time.

F.Colin Nath, David W. Muller, Uri Rosenschein, Stephen G. Ellis, Eric J. Topol

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are used for monitoring heparin therapy during coronary angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine which parameter is more useful clinically, and to assess the correlation between ACT and APTT. The authors measured these parameters at fixed intervals (0, 15, 30, 60, 150 and 240 mins) following intravenous heparin administration (12,500 +/- 3100 U) during coronary intervention in 39 patients. APTT rose to 'therapeutic' levels (true therapeutic levels have not been defined for these coagulation tests) more rapidly and fell to subtherapeutic levels more slowly than did ACT. The combination of a subtherapeutic ACT with a therapeutic APTT occurred far more often than did concordant therapeutic ACT and APTT values (69% versus 31%, P < 0.0004). There was a relatively poor correlation between ACT and APTT (r = 0.76). There were no abrupt closures in the study patients. It was concluded that subthreshold ACTs with high APTTs occur frequently, suggesting the improved suitability of ACT for intraprocedural monitoring of anticoagulation status. If one accepts the minimum amount of anticoagulation for prevention of thrombosis to be that which produces an ACT of greater than 300 s, then an APTT of greater than 90 s does not predict adequate anticoagulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are used for monitoring heparin therapy during coronary angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine which parameter is more useful clinically, and to assess the correlation between ACT and APTT. The authors measured these parameters at fixed intervals (0, 15, 30, 60, 150 and 240 mins) following intravenous heparin administration (12,500 +/- 3100 U) during coronary intervention in 39 patients. APTT rose to 'therapeutic' levels (true therapeutic levels have not been defined for these coagulation tests) more rapidly and fell to subtherapeutic levels more slowly than did ACT. The combination of a subtherapeutic ACT with a therapeutic APTT occurred far more often than did concordant therapeutic ACT and APTT values (69% versus 31%, P < 0.0004). There was a relatively poor correlation between ACT and APTT (r = 0.76). There were no abrupt closures in the study patients. It was concluded that subthreshold ACTs with high APTTs occur frequently, suggesting the improved suitability of ACT for intraprocedural monitoring of anticoagulation status. If one accepts the minimum amount of anticoagulation for prevention of thrombosis to be that which produces an ACT of greater than 300 s, then an APTT of greater than 90 s does not predict adequate anticoagulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are used for monitoring heparin therapy during coronary angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine which parameter is more useful clinically, and to assess the correlation between ACT and APTT. The authors measured these parameters at fixed intervals (0, 15, 30, 60, 150 and 240 mins) following intravenous heparin administration (12,500 +/- 3100 U) during coronary intervention in 39 patients. APTT rose to 'therapeutic' levels (true therapeutic levels have not been defined for these coagulation tests) more rapidly and fell to subtherapeutic levels more slowly than did ACT. The combination of a subtherapeutic ACT with a therapeutic APTT occurred far more often than did concordant therapeutic ACT and APTT values (69% versus 31%, P < 0.0004). There was a relatively poor correlation between ACT and APTT (r = 0.76). There were no abrupt closures in the study patients. It was concluded that subthreshold ACTs with high APTTs occur frequently, suggesting the improved suitability of ACT for intraprocedural monitoring of anticoagulation status. If one accepts the minimum amount of anticoagulation for prevention of thrombosis to be that which produces an ACT of greater than 300 s, then an APTT of greater than 90 s does not predict adequate anticoagulation.

Key concepts: Partial thromboplastin time, Medicine, Activated clotting time, Heparin, Angioplasty, Clotting time, Coagulation, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heparin monitoring during coronary intervention: activated clotting time versus activated partial thromboplastin time. — Research Paper | ScholarLens