1989PubMedRequires access

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma.

V M Chasseray, George Kiroff, J. L. Buard, B Launois

Open publisher page 117 citations

Abstract

A prospective trial was conducted to compare intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or lower one-third of the esophagus. One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to have either a cervical or thoracic anastomosis. Thirty-one patients were subsequently excluded either because esophagectomy was performed without thoracotomy or the tumor was unresectable or because the randomization protocol was not complied with. Transfusion requirements and operating time were similar for the 49 patients having esophagectomy by way of the laparotomy and right thoracotomy (TA) and the 43 patients who underwent laparotomy, right thoracotomy and cervicotomy (CA). Forty-three per cent of the CA and 49 per cent of the TA patients had involved lymph nodes. An esophagectomy incorporating a cervical anastomosis resulted in a significantly greater margin of macroscopically normal esophagus above the tumor (median of 4.0 versus 1.5 centimeters for TA). A leak was significantly more frequent after cervical anastomosis (26 per cent) than thoracic (4 per cent) (p less than 0.002). Respiratory complications were more frequent with a thoracic anastomosis, but this was not statistically significant. Thirty day mortality rates were similar for the two groups: 14.3 per cent, TA, and 9.3 per cent, CA (p = N.S.). Postoperative strictures occurred in 14 per cent of TA and 23 per cent of CA patients and were most common after an anastomotic leak. The survival patterns of the two groups were similar. The median survival time for CA patients was 23 months and for TA, 20 months. Excluding hospital mortality, 47 per cent of patients were alive at two years and 30 per cent at 40 months. Survival was related to extent of disease. The greater length of tumor-free esophagus removed with a cervical anastomosis did not result in an improved long term survival period, but was associated with a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic fistula.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A prospective trial was conducted to compare intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or lower one-third of the esophagus. One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to have either a cervical or thoracic anastomosis. Thirty-one patients were subsequently excluded either because esophagectomy was performed without thoracotomy or the tumor was unresectable or because the randomization protocol was not complied with. Transfusion requirements and operating time were similar for the 49 patients having esophagectomy by way of the laparotomy and right thoracotomy (TA) and the 43 patients who underwent laparotomy, right thoracotomy and cervicotomy (CA). Forty-three per cent of the CA and 49 per cent of the TA patients had involved lymph nodes. An esophagectomy incorporating a cervical anastomosis resulted in a significantly greater margin of macroscopically normal esophagus above the tumor (median of 4.0 versus 1.5 centimeters for TA). A leak was significantly more frequent after cervical anastomosis (26 per cent) than thoracic (4 per cent) (p less than 0.002). Respiratory complications were more frequent with a thoracic anastomosis, but this was not statistically significant. Thirty day mortality rates were similar for the two groups: 14.3 per cent, TA, and 9.3 per cent, CA (p = N.S.). Postoperative strictures occurred in 14 per cent of TA and 23 per cent of CA patients and were most common after an anastomotic leak. The survival patterns of the two groups were similar. The median survival time for CA patients was 23 months and for TA, 20 months. Excluding hospital mortality, 47 per cent of patients were alive at two years and 30 per cent at 40 months. Survival was related to extent of disease. The greater length of tumor-free esophagus removed with a cervical anastomosis did not result in an improved long term survival period, but was associated with a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic fistula.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A prospective trial was conducted to compare intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or lower one-third of the esophagus. One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to have either a cervical or thoracic anastomosis. Thirty-one patients were subsequently excluded either because esophagectomy was performed without thoracotomy or the tumor was unresectable or because the randomization protocol was not complied with. Transfusion requirements and operating time were similar for the 49 patients having esophagectomy by way of the laparotomy and right thoracotomy (TA) and the 43 patients who underwent laparotomy, right thoracotomy and cervicotomy (CA). Forty-three per cent of the CA and 49 per cent of the TA patients had involved lymph nodes. An esophagectomy incorporating a cervical anastomosis resulted in a significantly greater margin of macroscopically normal esophagus above the tumor (median of 4.0 versus 1.5 centimeters for TA). A leak was significantly more frequent after cervical anastomosis (26 per cent) than thoracic (4 per cent) (p less than 0.002). Respiratory complications were more frequent with a thoracic anastomosis, but this was not statistically significant. Thirty day mortality rates were similar for the two groups: 14.3 per cent, TA, and 9.3 per cent, CA (p = N.S.). Postoperative strictures occurred in 14 per cent of TA and 23 per cent of CA patients and were most common after an anastomotic leak. The survival patterns of the two groups were similar. The median survival time for CA patients was 23 months and for TA, 20 months. Excluding hospital mortality, 47 per cent of patients were alive at two years and 30 per cent at 40 months. Survival was related to extent of disease. The greater length of tumor-free esophagus removed with a cervical anastomosis did not result in an improved long term survival period, but was associated with a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic fistula.

Key concepts: Medicine, Esophagectomy, Thoracotomy, Laparotomy, Anastomosis, Surgery, Esophagus, Randomization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma. — Research Paper | ScholarLens