2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

ARE CLASS ACTIONS FOR CONSUMER FRAUD A FRAUD ON THE CONSUMER

Bernardus J. Smit

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Consumer protection has been the subject of much state and federal attention and legislation in recent years. It is certainly appropriate that this unorganized and long unrepresented group should now be gaining this attention. Recently, class actions have been suggested as a solution many of the consumer's ills. Such actions allow representative individuals to sue on behalf of all other similarly situated consumers to right wrongs wrought on all of them. Most states have some sort of class action provision as does, of course, the federal government in Rule 23. 1 In the federal realm, Congress is presently studying the federal law and considering the relaxation of the jurisdictional requirement that federal class actions must allege damages of $10,000 without aggregating the claims of the individual class members.2 The proposals have followed two lines : the first proposed by Senator Ty dings and Representative Eckhardt would eliminate the jurisdictional amount requirement and open federal courts to consumer class actions claiming violation of any state or federal statutory or decisional law for the benefit of consumers;3 the second, proposed by the administration, would sanction consumer class actions after the federal government has brought a successful enforcement action against the defendant violation of any one of eleven unfair or deceptive practices.4 The bill which has been reported out of the House subcommittee5 in effect combines both approaches. It eliminates the aggregation rule in federal courts. It includes provisions both preliminary actions by the federal government and direct consumer class actions. The bill in effect engrafts Federal Rule 23 to the civil procedure of the states and permits state courts to hear consumer class actions on a concurrent basis with the federal courts. The provision thus gives those states which have not heretofore permitted class actions or have permitted them only to a limited extent a ready-made class action statute (presumably consumer actions only), incorporating Federal Rule 23.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Consumer protection has been the subject of much state and federal attention and legislation in recent years. It is certainly appropriate that this unorganized and long unrepresented group should now be gaining this attention. Recently, class actions have been suggested as a solution many of the consumer's ills. Such actions allow representative individuals to sue on behalf of all other similarly situated consumers to right wrongs wrought on all of them. Most states have some sort of class action provision as does, of course, the federal government in Rule 23. 1 In the federal realm, Congress is presently studying the federal law and considering the relaxation of the jurisdictional requirement that federal class actions must allege damages of $10,000 without aggregating the claims of the individual class members.2 The proposals have followed two lines : the first proposed by Senator Ty dings and Representative Eckhardt would eliminate the jurisdictional amount requirement and open federal courts to consumer class actions claiming violation of any state or federal statutory or decisional law for the benefit of consumers;3 the second, proposed by the administration, would sanction consumer class actions after the federal government has brought a successful enforcement action against the defendant violation of any one of eleven unfair or deceptive practices.4 The bill which has been reported out of the House subcommittee5 in effect combines both approaches. It eliminates the aggregation rule in federal courts. It includes provisions both preliminary actions by the federal government and direct consumer class actions. The bill in effect engrafts Federal Rule 23 to the civil procedure of the states and permits state courts to hear consumer class actions on a concurrent basis with the federal courts. The provision thus gives those states which have not heretofore permitted class actions or have permitted them only to a limited extent a ready-made class action statute (presumably consumer actions only), incorporating Federal Rule 23.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Consumer protection has been the subject of much state and federal attention and legislation in recent years. It is certainly appropriate that this unorganized and long unrepresented group should now be gaining this attention. Recently, class actions have been suggested as a solution many of the consumer's ills. Such actions allow representative individuals to sue on behalf of all other similarly situated consumers to right wrongs wrought on all of them. Most states have some sort of class action provision as does, of course, the federal government in Rule 23. 1 In the federal realm, Congress is presently studying the federal law and considering the relaxation of the jurisdictional requirement that federal class actions must allege damages of $10,000 without aggregating the claims of the individual class members.2 The proposals have followed two lines : the first proposed by Senator Ty dings and Representative Eckhardt would eliminate the jurisdictional amount requirement and open federal courts to consumer class actions claiming violation of any state or federal statutory or decisional law for the benefit of consumers;3 the second, proposed by the administration, would sanction consumer class actions after the federal government has brought a successful enforcement action against the defendant violation of any one of eleven unfair or deceptive practices.4 The bill which has been reported out of the House subcommittee5 in effect combines both approaches. It eliminates the aggregation rule in federal courts. It includes provisions both preliminary actions by the federal government and direct consumer class actions. The bill in effect engrafts Federal Rule 23 to the civil procedure of the states and permits state courts to hear consumer class actions on a concurrent basis with the federal courts. The provision thus gives those states which have not heretofore permitted class actions or have permitted them only to a limited extent a ready-made class action statute (presumably consumer actions only), incorporating Federal Rule 23.

Key concepts: Class action, Legislation, Federal law, Law, Enforcement, Consumer protection, Statutory law, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ARE CLASS ACTIONS FOR CONSUMER FRAUD A FRAUD ON THE CONSUMER — Research Paper | ScholarLens