2013viXraRequires access

Contradicting Relativity with Logic

Andrew Nassif

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The theory of relativity compresses the two theories made by Albert Einstein that are known as: General Relativity and Special Relativity. General Relativity talks about relations in the space-time continuum that relate to energy and the relation in which the momentum of matter and radiation that are found present. It also considers the geometry of space, and motion bodies in free fall, as well as the propagation of light. Special Relativity is the mass-energy equivalence formula E=MC^2 where C is the speed of light in a vacuum. Logical Paradoxes is uses of circular logic in order to contradict something, this is one of the most commonly used methods in questioning something in science, especially theories. Today we will look at using it to question relativity itself, and its possibility. We know that light contains matter, but not the same amount of particles in each part of light, so that means it still could travel at different average speeds. Basically light uses the same particles but not the same amount in each part of its beam, that is one of the reason we can't really calculate the average speed of light, logically. We will use this deep method in terms of professionalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The theory of relativity compresses the two theories made by Albert Einstein that are known as: General Relativity and Special Relativity. General Relativity talks about relations in the space-time continuum that relate to energy and the relation in which the momentum of matter and radiation that are found present. It also considers the geometry of space, and motion bodies in free fall, as well as the propagation of light. Special Relativity is the mass-energy equivalence formula E=MC^2 where C is the speed of light in a vacuum. Logical Paradoxes is uses of circular logic in order to contradict something, this is one of the most commonly used methods in questioning something in science, especially theories. Today we will look at using it to question relativity itself, and its possibility. We know that light contains matter, but not the same amount of particles in each part of light, so that means it still could travel at different average speeds. Basically light uses the same particles but not the same amount in each part of its beam, that is one of the reason we can't really calculate the average speed of light, logically. We will use this deep method in terms of professionalism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The theory of relativity compresses the two theories made by Albert Einstein that are known as: General Relativity and Special Relativity. General Relativity talks about relations in the space-time continuum that relate to energy and the relation in which the momentum of matter and radiation that are found present. It also considers the geometry of space, and motion bodies in free fall, as well as the propagation of light. Special Relativity is the mass-energy equivalence formula E=MC^2 where C is the speed of light in a vacuum. Logical Paradoxes is uses of circular logic in order to contradict something, this is one of the most commonly used methods in questioning something in science, especially theories. Today we will look at using it to question relativity itself, and its possibility. We know that light contains matter, but not the same amount of particles in each part of light, so that means it still could travel at different average speeds. Basically light uses the same particles but not the same amount in each part of its beam, that is one of the reason we can't really calculate the average speed of light, logically. We will use this deep method in terms of professionalism.

Key concepts: Theory of relativity, Special relativity, Speed of light (cellular automaton), Theoretical physics, Absolute time and space, Einstein, Physics, Tests of special relativity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contradicting Relativity with Logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens