2003Journal of the Association for Information SystemsRequires access

Evaluating Information Technology Investments in an Organizational Context

Paul M. Tuten

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Information technology (IT) investments yield uncertain and unexpected results; successful outcomes are not guaranteed. Because of this organizations must strive to manage their IT investments effectively. Evaluation plays a critical role in successful IT management; however, it presents many difficulties for both the practitioner and researcher. In the literature, most IT evaluation methods are highly prescriptive in terms of their procedures and evaluation criteria. Paradoxically, many researchers have suggested that successful evaluation must be contextual—it must address the social and organizational aspects of evaluation and decision-making, as well as their effects on IT investment outcomes. These circumstances present a conundrum: how can researchers create contextually-sensitive evaluation methodologies while simultaneously providing practitioners with enough methodological guidance for conducting their evaluations? In this paper, the author presents a framework for his dissertation research—research that investigates and will attempt to assist in resolving this paradox.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Information technology (IT) investments yield uncertain and unexpected results; successful outcomes are not guaranteed. Because of this organizations must strive to manage their IT investments effectively. Evaluation plays a critical role in successful IT management; however, it presents many difficulties for both the practitioner and researcher. In the literature, most IT evaluation methods are highly prescriptive in terms of their procedures and evaluation criteria. Paradoxically, many researchers have suggested that successful evaluation must be contextual—it must address the social and organizational aspects of evaluation and decision-making, as well as their effects on IT investment outcomes. These circumstances present a conundrum: how can researchers create contextually-sensitive evaluation methodologies while simultaneously providing practitioners with enough methodological guidance for conducting their evaluations? In this paper, the author presents a framework for his dissertation research—research that investigates and will attempt to assist in resolving this paradox.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Information technology (IT) investments yield uncertain and unexpected results; successful outcomes are not guaranteed. Because of this organizations must strive to manage their IT investments effectively. Evaluation plays a critical role in successful IT management; however, it presents many difficulties for both the practitioner and researcher. In the literature, most IT evaluation methods are highly prescriptive in terms of their procedures and evaluation criteria. Paradoxically, many researchers have suggested that successful evaluation must be contextual—it must address the social and organizational aspects of evaluation and decision-making, as well as their effects on IT investment outcomes. These circumstances present a conundrum: how can researchers create contextually-sensitive evaluation methodologies while simultaneously providing practitioners with enough methodological guidance for conducting their evaluations? In this paper, the author presents a framework for his dissertation research—research that investigates and will attempt to assist in resolving this paradox.

Key concepts: Context (archaeology), Knowledge management, Investment (military), Computer science, Management science, Information technology, Process management, Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating Information Technology Investments in an Organizational Context — Research Paper | ScholarLens