2005PubMedRequires access

A comparison of F waves in peripheral nerve disorders.

Abdülkadir Koçer, Eren Gözke, Nimet Dörtcan, Önder Us

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: F waves have become integral parts of nerve conduction studies in particular. F minimum (Fmin), the most commonly assessed latency, represents the largest and the fastest conducting fibers. The diagnostic yields of other F wave parameters are not obvious. In the present study, we aimed to determine the value of F wave parameters in commonly seen peripheral nerve disorders. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied the F responses in 118 patients who had been diagnosed with different types of neuropathies, clinically and electrodiagnostically, and 68 individuals were used as controls: A total of 470 motor nerve conduction studies and related F-wave parameters were analyzed. DISCUSSION: F maximum (Fmax) was the most commonly seen abnormal parameter in the present study, although Fmin has until now been the most commonly studied parameter in clinics routinely. Abnormalities of F waves were more frequently seen in the patients compared to those in the control group and the differences were significant for carpal tunnel syndrome and upper extremity radiculopathies. CONCLUSION: This large database showed that F wave evaluations should include not only Fmin but also Fmax.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND AIM: F waves have become integral parts of nerve conduction studies in particular. F minimum (Fmin), the most commonly assessed latency, represents the largest and the fastest conducting fibers. The diagnostic yields of other F wave parameters are not obvious. In the present study, we aimed to determine the value of F wave parameters in commonly seen peripheral nerve disorders. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied the F responses in 118 patients who had been diagnosed with different types of neuropathies, clinically and electrodiagnostically, and 68 individuals were used as controls: A total of 470 motor nerve conduction studies and related F-wave parameters were analyzed. DISCUSSION: F maximum (Fmax) was the most commonly seen abnormal parameter in the present study, although Fmin has until now been the most commonly studied parameter in clinics routinely. Abnormalities of F waves were more frequently seen in the patients compared to those in the control group and the differences were significant for carpal tunnel syndrome and upper extremity radiculopathies. CONCLUSION: This large database showed that F wave evaluations should include not only Fmin but also Fmax.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: F waves have become integral parts of nerve conduction studies in particular. F minimum (Fmin), the most commonly assessed latency, represents the largest and the fastest conducting fibers. The diagnostic yields of other F wave parameters are not obvious. In the present study, we aimed to determine the value of F wave parameters in commonly seen peripheral nerve disorders. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied the F responses in 118 patients who had been diagnosed with different types of neuropathies, clinically and electrodiagnostically, and 68 individuals were used as controls: A total of 470 motor nerve conduction studies and related F-wave parameters were analyzed. DISCUSSION: F maximum (Fmax) was the most commonly seen abnormal parameter in the present study, although Fmin has until now been the most commonly studied parameter in clinics routinely. Abnormalities of F waves were more frequently seen in the patients compared to those in the control group and the differences were significant for carpal tunnel syndrome and upper extremity radiculopathies. CONCLUSION: This large database showed that F wave evaluations should include not only Fmin but also Fmax.

Key concepts: F wave, Carpal tunnel syndrome, Nerve conduction, Nerve conduction velocity, Medicine, Median nerve, Electrodiagnosis, Peripheral nerve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of F waves in peripheral nerve disorders. — Research Paper | ScholarLens