1979OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Commercialization Task Force on industrial atmospheric fluidized bed combustion

FC McElroy, S.I. Freedman, E.C. Luthy, Cherice Smith, J.H. Smithson, R. Cilimberg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It was concluded that: AFBC has the potential for making a substantial near-term impact on direct utilization of coal, and can enhance replacement of oil/gas as a boiler fuel. A large potential market exists for AFBC in the large boiler (100 million Btu/h) market segment; an even larger market exists in small boilers, process heaters and other combustors, but this latter market has not been explored in detail. AFBC is cost-competitive with conventional boilers, and appears to be about 15% cheaper than conventional boilers, plus flue gas scrubbers. At today's fuel prices, neither AFBC nor conventional coal fired boilers can compete with oil/gas, in many areas. AFBC can meet existing environmental standards, and it is expected that future revised standards will be attainable by AFBC units, but operating cost impact is not yet known, and could pose problems. Such problems could well be equally, or more severe, with conventional boilers. Adequate technical and manufacturing capability exists to supply anticipated AFBC markets. AFBC has been demonstrated at small scale, only. Additional commercial-scale demonstration is required to accelerate and insure industrial use, in the near term. In summary, AFBC provides an environmentally and economically attractive alternative to flue-gas scrubbers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It was concluded that: AFBC has the potential for making a substantial near-term impact on direct utilization of coal, and can enhance replacement of oil/gas as a boiler fuel. A large potential market exists for AFBC in the large boiler (100 million Btu/h) market segment; an even larger market exists in small boilers, process heaters and other combustors, but this latter market has not been explored in detail. AFBC is cost-competitive with conventional boilers, and appears to be about 15% cheaper than conventional boilers, plus flue gas scrubbers. At today's fuel prices, neither AFBC nor conventional coal fired boilers can compete with oil/gas, in many areas. AFBC can meet existing environmental standards, and it is expected that future revised standards will be attainable by AFBC units, but operating cost impact is not yet known, and could pose problems. Such problems could well be equally, or more severe, with conventional boilers. Adequate technical and manufacturing capability exists to supply anticipated AFBC markets. AFBC has been demonstrated at small scale, only. Additional commercial-scale demonstration is required to accelerate and insure industrial use, in the near term. In summary, AFBC provides an environmentally and economically attractive alternative to flue-gas scrubbers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It was concluded that: AFBC has the potential for making a substantial near-term impact on direct utilization of coal, and can enhance replacement of oil/gas as a boiler fuel. A large potential market exists for AFBC in the large boiler (100 million Btu/h) market segment; an even larger market exists in small boilers, process heaters and other combustors, but this latter market has not been explored in detail. AFBC is cost-competitive with conventional boilers, and appears to be about 15% cheaper than conventional boilers, plus flue gas scrubbers. At today's fuel prices, neither AFBC nor conventional coal fired boilers can compete with oil/gas, in many areas. AFBC can meet existing environmental standards, and it is expected that future revised standards will be attainable by AFBC units, but operating cost impact is not yet known, and could pose problems. Such problems could well be equally, or more severe, with conventional boilers. Adequate technical and manufacturing capability exists to supply anticipated AFBC markets. AFBC has been demonstrated at small scale, only. Additional commercial-scale demonstration is required to accelerate and insure industrial use, in the near term. In summary, AFBC provides an environmentally and economically attractive alternative to flue-gas scrubbers.

Key concepts: Flue gas, Scrubber, Waste management, Boiler (water heating), Fuel oil, Coal, Commercialization, Combustion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commercialization Task Force on industrial atmospheric fluidized bed combustion — Research Paper | ScholarLens