1980OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Examination of the use of the breeder reactor to enhance security of energy supply. Final report

Gregory S. Jones, Brian G. Chow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Early commercialization of the breeder reactor has been justified in terms of its promise for lessening a nation's dependence on imported uranium. The relationship between breeder timing (assuming a vigorous but not instantaneous breeder penetration rate) and the reduction in uranium requirements is examined using Japan as an example. Comparing early and delayed breeder introductions (2006 and 2026 respectively in the high growth projections), the difference in cumulative uranium requirements is slight through the year 2045; for both scenarious, annual requirements remain high. The early breeder introduction strategy is more attractive when it incorporates a 30 percent improved LWR. However, given the unlikelihood of sufficient funding for the development of both designs, the optimal strategy for Japan is stockpiling uranium for an improved LWR and delaying introduction of the breeder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Early commercialization of the breeder reactor has been justified in terms of its promise for lessening a nation's dependence on imported uranium. The relationship between breeder timing (assuming a vigorous but not instantaneous breeder penetration rate) and the reduction in uranium requirements is examined using Japan as an example. Comparing early and delayed breeder introductions (2006 and 2026 respectively in the high growth projections), the difference in cumulative uranium requirements is slight through the year 2045; for both scenarious, annual requirements remain high. The early breeder introduction strategy is more attractive when it incorporates a 30 percent improved LWR. However, given the unlikelihood of sufficient funding for the development of both designs, the optimal strategy for Japan is stockpiling uranium for an improved LWR and delaying introduction of the breeder.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Early commercialization of the breeder reactor has been justified in terms of its promise for lessening a nation's dependence on imported uranium. The relationship between breeder timing (assuming a vigorous but not instantaneous breeder penetration rate) and the reduction in uranium requirements is examined using Japan as an example. Comparing early and delayed breeder introductions (2006 and 2026 respectively in the high growth projections), the difference in cumulative uranium requirements is slight through the year 2045; for both scenarious, annual requirements remain high. The early breeder introduction strategy is more attractive when it incorporates a 30 percent improved LWR. However, given the unlikelihood of sufficient funding for the development of both designs, the optimal strategy for Japan is stockpiling uranium for an improved LWR and delaying introduction of the breeder.

Key concepts: Breeder (animal), Breeder reactor, Uranium, Commercialization, Nuclear engineering, Environmental science, Engineering, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examination of the use of the breeder reactor to enhance security of energy supply. Final report — Research Paper | ScholarLens