Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984
Amartya Sen
Abstract
Amartya Sen
Abstract
The main aim of Dewey lectures is to explore a moral approach that sees persons from two different perspectives: and agency. Both the well-being aspect and the agency aspect of persons have their own relevance in the assessment of states and actions. A second objective is to examine a set of metaethical issues, making use of an approach to moral analysis which focuses on the admissibility and use of different types of information in moral valuation. Informational analysis can be used to bring out the content, scope, and limitations of different moral principles. A few examples may help to illustrate the diversity of ways in which informational constraints may be used through the specification of invariance requirements. Authorship invariance does have some claims to being a reasonable requirement of moral evaluation. The possibility of combining position relativity with authorship invariance is also the reason why positionality of moral valuation is perfectly consistent with objectivity of moral values.
OpenAlex reports 2695 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The main aim of Dewey lectures is to explore a moral approach that sees persons from two different perspectives: and agency. Both the well-being aspect and the agency aspect of persons have their own relevance in the assessment of states and actions. A second objective is to examine a set of metaethical issues, making use of an approach to moral analysis which focuses on the admissibility and use of different types of information in moral valuation. Informational analysis can be used to bring out the content, scope, and limitations of different moral principles. A few examples may help to illustrate the diversity of ways in which informational constraints may be used through the specification of invariance requirements. Authorship invariance does have some claims to being a reasonable requirement of moral evaluation. The possibility of combining position relativity with authorship invariance is also the reason why positionality of moral valuation is perfectly consistent with objectivity of moral values.
Key concepts: Agency (philosophy), Epistemology, Philosophy, Contemporary philosophy, Analytic philosophy, Sociology