1998•Lincoln (University of Nebraska)Requires access

The mentoring and professional development of part -time faculty

Cynthia Joan Hoss

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to relate part-time faculty mentoring systems with participation of part-time faculty in professional development programs. The study applies the concepts of mattering and marginality (Park, 1928; Rosenberg & McCullough, 1981; and Schlossberg, 1989). The independent variable of mentoring is defined as a developmental relationship that provides interaction between faculty members to promote professional and career development (Murray & Owen, 1991). The dependent variable of professional development is defined as activities designed to enhance growth (Barda, 1980). Variables of consideration were defined as the informal to formal nature of mentoring based on five paradigms of induction (Andrews, 1986). Central questions that focus the study were: How do professional developers in community colleges identify the components of their mentoring programs? Do part-time faculty participate in professional development opportunities? Does a comprehensive institutional mentoring program for part-time faculty lead to participation in professional development opportunities? What opportunities and services are available for community college part-time faculty? Data were gathered through a mailed survey to a population of 450 individual members listed on the national database of The National Council for Staff, Program and Organizational Development. A Faculty Mentoring/Professional Development Survey was developed to collect information on (a) institutional demographics, (b) mentoring programs, and (c) professional development and services available to part-time faculty. Results of this study should provide a stronger link between part-time faculty participation in mentoring as well as their involvement in professional development activities. Community college leaders who are in decision-making positions should find the results of this study to be valuable support for funding, sponsoring and implementing professional development programs for part-time faculty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to relate part-time faculty mentoring systems with participation of part-time faculty in professional development programs. The study applies the concepts of mattering and marginality (Park, 1928; Rosenberg & McCullough, 1981; and Schlossberg, 1989). The independent variable of mentoring is defined as a developmental relationship that provides interaction between faculty members to promote professional and career development (Murray & Owen, 1991). The dependent variable of professional development is defined as activities designed to enhance growth (Barda, 1980). Variables of consideration were defined as the informal to formal nature of mentoring based on five paradigms of induction (Andrews, 1986). Central questions that focus the study were: How do professional developers in community colleges identify the components of their mentoring programs? Do part-time faculty participate in professional development opportunities? Does a comprehensive institutional mentoring program for part-time faculty lead to participation in professional development opportunities? What opportunities and services are available for community college part-time faculty? Data were gathered through a mailed survey to a population of 450 individual members listed on the national database of The National Council for Staff, Program and Organizational Development. A Faculty Mentoring/Professional Development Survey was developed to collect information on (a) institutional demographics, (b) mentoring programs, and (c) professional development and services available to part-time faculty. Results of this study should provide a stronger link between part-time faculty participation in mentoring as well as their involvement in professional development activities. Community college leaders who are in decision-making positions should find the results of this study to be valuable support for funding, sponsoring and implementing professional development programs for part-time faculty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to relate part-time faculty mentoring systems with participation of part-time faculty in professional development programs. The study applies the concepts of mattering and marginality (Park, 1928; Rosenberg & McCullough, 1981; and Schlossberg, 1989). The independent variable of mentoring is defined as a developmental relationship that provides interaction between faculty members to promote professional and career development (Murray & Owen, 1991). The dependent variable of professional development is defined as activities designed to enhance growth (Barda, 1980). Variables of consideration were defined as the informal to formal nature of mentoring based on five paradigms of induction (Andrews, 1986). Central questions that focus the study were: How do professional developers in community colleges identify the components of their mentoring programs? Do part-time faculty participate in professional development opportunities? Does a comprehensive institutional mentoring program for part-time faculty lead to participation in professional development opportunities? What opportunities and services are available for community college part-time faculty? Data were gathered through a mailed survey to a population of 450 individual members listed on the national database of The National Council for Staff, Program and Organizational Development. A Faculty Mentoring/Professional Development Survey was developed to collect information on (a) institutional demographics, (b) mentoring programs, and (c) professional development and services available to part-time faculty. Results of this study should provide a stronger link between part-time faculty participation in mentoring as well as their involvement in professional development activities. Community college leaders who are in decision-making positions should find the results of this study to be valuable support for funding, sponsoring and implementing professional development programs for part-time faculty.

Key concepts: Professional development, Medical education, Faculty development, Peer mentoring, Pedagogy, Psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The mentoring and professional development of part -time faculty — Research Paper | ScholarLens