2003Unpublished venueRequires access

What transport for Cambridge

Marcial Echeñique, Tom Hargreaves

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The policy of development restraint in Cambridge has resulted in traffic congestion as the daily influx of workers from outside the city exceeds those dwelling there. Current public transport is not considered viable for many of these journeys. A full study of the transport options for the Cambridge area was undertaken by a consortium of local business leaders, politicians, local government officers, professionals and academics. Options considered include: cycling / walking, public transport, orbital road network improvements, congestion charging, and a combination of options. Expansion of the built-up areas of the city and overall sub-regional growth is likely to cause more congestion. The cycling and walking option improvements were considered worthwhile in any case. The public transport option improved sustainability but the costs were too great for the benefits likely to be obtained. The orbital highway would provide substantial benefits in terms of savings in money, time and convenience. Congestion charging had benefits of time savings, reduced congestion and reduced carbon emission but the overal user benefits were negative. The combination option generated positive economic and environmental benefits and the congestion charge component could partially fund the public transport and highway improvements. Only options including a congestion charge resulted in a change in modal split.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The policy of development restraint in Cambridge has resulted in traffic congestion as the daily influx of workers from outside the city exceeds those dwelling there. Current public transport is not considered viable for many of these journeys. A full study of the transport options for the Cambridge area was undertaken by a consortium of local business leaders, politicians, local government officers, professionals and academics. Options considered include: cycling / walking, public transport, orbital road network improvements, congestion charging, and a combination of options. Expansion of the built-up areas of the city and overall sub-regional growth is likely to cause more congestion. The cycling and walking option improvements were considered worthwhile in any case. The public transport option improved sustainability but the costs were too great for the benefits likely to be obtained. The orbital highway would provide substantial benefits in terms of savings in money, time and convenience. Congestion charging had benefits of time savings, reduced congestion and reduced carbon emission but the overal user benefits were negative. The combination option generated positive economic and environmental benefits and the congestion charge component could partially fund the public transport and highway improvements. Only options including a congestion charge resulted in a change in modal split.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The policy of development restraint in Cambridge has resulted in traffic congestion as the daily influx of workers from outside the city exceeds those dwelling there. Current public transport is not considered viable for many of these journeys. A full study of the transport options for the Cambridge area was undertaken by a consortium of local business leaders, politicians, local government officers, professionals and academics. Options considered include: cycling / walking, public transport, orbital road network improvements, congestion charging, and a combination of options. Expansion of the built-up areas of the city and overall sub-regional growth is likely to cause more congestion. The cycling and walking option improvements were considered worthwhile in any case. The public transport option improved sustainability but the costs were too great for the benefits likely to be obtained. The orbital highway would provide substantial benefits in terms of savings in money, time and convenience. Congestion charging had benefits of time savings, reduced congestion and reduced carbon emission but the overal user benefits were negative. The combination option generated positive economic and environmental benefits and the congestion charge component could partially fund the public transport and highway improvements. Only options including a congestion charge resulted in a change in modal split.

Key concepts: Public transport, Traffic congestion, Congestion pricing, Business, Sustainability, Government (linguistics), Transport engineering, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What transport for Cambridge — Research Paper | ScholarLens