BUS SERVICES: DEREGULATION AND PRIVATIZATION (LESSONS FOR THIRD WORLD CITIES). IN: HANDBOOK OF TRANSPORT SYSTEMS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
Alan Armstrong-Wright
Abstract
Alan Armstrong-Wright
Abstract
Economic deregulation and privatization of urban bus services can have both negative and positive aspects. This paper examines the experience of deregulation and privatization in: London, England; the U.K. outside of London; Accra, Ghana; Santiago, Chile; Kingston, Jamaica; Hong Kong; Riga, Latvia; and Nairobi, Kenya. These examples reveal that the following factors should be addressed in deregulation and privatization efforts: the objective of the deregulation and privatization, the need for some regulation even in a deregulated system, encouragement of public transport, decontrol of fares, fare evasion, non-commercial routes, commercial law, the capacity of the bus industry, private monopolies, the reliability of services, multitrip ticketing, concessionary travel and privatization strategy. The problems and solutions encountered in these experiences can be adapted to assist developing countries where better bus service is becoming an increasingly important approach for dealing with rapidly growing populations and urban road congestion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Economic deregulation and privatization of urban bus services can have both negative and positive aspects. This paper examines the experience of deregulation and privatization in: London, England; the U.K. outside of London; Accra, Ghana; Santiago, Chile; Kingston, Jamaica; Hong Kong; Riga, Latvia; and Nairobi, Kenya. These examples reveal that the following factors should be addressed in deregulation and privatization efforts: the objective of the deregulation and privatization, the need for some regulation even in a deregulated system, encouragement of public transport, decontrol of fares, fare evasion, non-commercial routes, commercial law, the capacity of the bus industry, private monopolies, the reliability of services, multitrip ticketing, concessionary travel and privatization strategy. The problems and solutions encountered in these experiences can be adapted to assist developing countries where better bus service is becoming an increasingly important approach for dealing with rapidly growing populations and urban road congestion.
Key concepts: Deregulation, Public transport, Service (business), Business, Passenger transport, Traffic congestion, Liberalization, Control (management)