2013European Transport Conference 2013Association for European Transport (AET)Requires access

Responding Slowly to Change? Passenger Rail Demand in Great Britain

Matthew D. Shepherd, Remi Martins-Tonks, Anthony Magee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an econometric analysis of long-distance rail demand in Great Britain. The analysis used data from Quarter 1 1998 to Quarter 4 2012 to examine why passengers may not always respond to changes in demand drivers immediately. The analysis identified how long it would take for changes in demand drivers such as fares and income to affect passenger journeys, and found that it would take approximately a year for the full effect to be felt. Other findings from the analysis included the following: (1) the long-distance rail market appears to be working in accordance with economic theory: the fare elasticity is close to one, suggesting that train operating companies (TOCs) may be pricing close to the profit-maximising position in this market; (2) performance (ie, the extent to which trains arrive on time) and income have been an important factor in determining demand; and (3) there is a continuing modal shift from cars to rail, which is possibly in response to the increasing costs of owning and operating a car. The results imply that if operators want to further increase revenues then this may have to come from higher passenger numbers rather than more expensive fares. The continuing shift from road to rail may also continue only if the cost of motoring continues to increase faster than rail fares.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the results of an econometric analysis of long-distance rail demand in Great Britain. The analysis used data from Quarter 1 1998 to Quarter 4 2012 to examine why passengers may not always respond to changes in demand drivers immediately. The analysis identified how long it would take for changes in demand drivers such as fares and income to affect passenger journeys, and found that it would take approximately a year for the full effect to be felt. Other findings from the analysis included the following: (1) the long-distance rail market appears to be working in accordance with economic theory: the fare elasticity is close to one, suggesting that train operating companies (TOCs) may be pricing close to the profit-maximising position in this market; (2) performance (ie, the extent to which trains arrive on time) and income have been an important factor in determining demand; and (3) there is a continuing modal shift from cars to rail, which is possibly in response to the increasing costs of owning and operating a car. The results imply that if operators want to further increase revenues then this may have to come from higher passenger numbers rather than more expensive fares. The continuing shift from road to rail may also continue only if the cost of motoring continues to increase faster than rail fares.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the results of an econometric analysis of long-distance rail demand in Great Britain. The analysis used data from Quarter 1 1998 to Quarter 4 2012 to examine why passengers may not always respond to changes in demand drivers immediately. The analysis identified how long it would take for changes in demand drivers such as fares and income to affect passenger journeys, and found that it would take approximately a year for the full effect to be felt. Other findings from the analysis included the following: (1) the long-distance rail market appears to be working in accordance with economic theory: the fare elasticity is close to one, suggesting that train operating companies (TOCs) may be pricing close to the profit-maximising position in this market; (2) performance (ie, the extent to which trains arrive on time) and income have been an important factor in determining demand; and (3) there is a continuing modal shift from cars to rail, which is possibly in response to the increasing costs of owning and operating a car. The results imply that if operators want to further increase revenues then this may have to come from higher passenger numbers rather than more expensive fares. The continuing shift from road to rail may also continue only if the cost of motoring continues to increase faster than rail fares.

Key concepts: Revenue, Profit (economics), Train, Economics, Price elasticity of demand, Quarter (Canadian coin), Modal shift, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Responding Slowly to Change? Passenger Rail Demand in Great Britain — Research Paper | ScholarLens