Hayek and Individualism : Some Question Marks
Filomena De Sousa
Abstract
Filomena De Sousa
Abstract
Hayek’s attachment to an evolutionary analysis of socio-economic life is often interpreted as creating problems for his enduring commitment to Methodological Individualism (henceforth MI). This paper tackles this question by focusing on the consequences of the shift of ideas expressed by his later works. It analyses Hayek’s evolutionary theory of spontaneous order and outlines the systemic and holist dimensions entailed by the notion of self-organisation. I argue that to describe Hayek’s methodological framework as a case of mi is to overlook the crucial developments that took place in the late 1950s as he went on to articulate his view of social order as a complex adaptive system.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Hayek’s attachment to an evolutionary analysis of socio-economic life is often interpreted as creating problems for his enduring commitment to Methodological Individualism (henceforth MI). This paper tackles this question by focusing on the consequences of the shift of ideas expressed by his later works. It analyses Hayek’s evolutionary theory of spontaneous order and outlines the systemic and holist dimensions entailed by the notion of self-organisation. I argue that to describe Hayek’s methodological framework as a case of mi is to overlook the crucial developments that took place in the late 1950s as he went on to articulate his view of social order as a complex adaptive system.
Key concepts: Methodological individualism, Individualism, Spontaneous order, Order (exchange), Sociology, Epistemology, Social order, Social system