1977Australian Road Research Board Conference ProcRequires access

GEOMETRIC ROAD DESIGN-SOME RECENT RESEARCH

J R McLean

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The traditional rationale of geometric road design standards is examined and developments and recent research in four aspects of geometric road design are reviewed: the rational basis of design standards; horizontal curve design; sight distance requirements; and the relationship between safety and design. Three main points are brought out in the paper, all of which must be regarded as unproved in the real world and worthy of further consideration. First, the specifications of a design speed, and the adherence to the geometric standards for that speed, does not in itself ensure a safe road. Second, where it is not possible to provide vertical curves with sight distances adequate for overtaking, there may be operational, as well as economic, advantages in designing for minimum sight distance. Third, while higher geometric standards means safer operations for roads designed to 'highway' standard, this may not apply to low standard roads. /TRRL/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The traditional rationale of geometric road design standards is examined and developments and recent research in four aspects of geometric road design are reviewed: the rational basis of design standards; horizontal curve design; sight distance requirements; and the relationship between safety and design. Three main points are brought out in the paper, all of which must be regarded as unproved in the real world and worthy of further consideration. First, the specifications of a design speed, and the adherence to the geometric standards for that speed, does not in itself ensure a safe road. Second, where it is not possible to provide vertical curves with sight distances adequate for overtaking, there may be operational, as well as economic, advantages in designing for minimum sight distance. Third, while higher geometric standards means safer operations for roads designed to 'highway' standard, this may not apply to low standard roads. /TRRL/

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The traditional rationale of geometric road design standards is examined and developments and recent research in four aspects of geometric road design are reviewed: the rational basis of design standards; horizontal curve design; sight distance requirements; and the relationship between safety and design. Three main points are brought out in the paper, all of which must be regarded as unproved in the real world and worthy of further consideration. First, the specifications of a design speed, and the adherence to the geometric standards for that speed, does not in itself ensure a safe road. Second, where it is not possible to provide vertical curves with sight distances adequate for overtaking, there may be operational, as well as economic, advantages in designing for minimum sight distance. Third, while higher geometric standards means safer operations for roads designed to 'highway' standard, this may not apply to low standard roads. /TRRL/

Key concepts: Geometric design, Sight, SAFER, Overtaking, Design speed, Transport engineering, Computer science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GEOMETRIC ROAD DESIGN-SOME RECENT RESEARCH — Research Paper | ScholarLens