2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of Innovative Safety Treatments. Volume 5: A Study of the Effectiveness of Countdown Pedestrian Signals

Vivek Reddy, Tapan Kumar Datta, Peter Tarmo Savolainen, Satya Pinapaka

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Broward County Traffic Engineering Division and the City of Boca Raton replaced traditional pedestrian signals at eight intersections located in the South Florida area with countdown pedestrian signals. The countdown pedestrian signal is comprised of the same three indications as the conventional pedestrian signal. The flashing “Don’t Walk” indication, however, is complemented by an illuminated number indicating the number of seconds before the steady “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated and thus provides feedback to pedestrians on the time remaining in their crossing. By advising the pedestrian of the remaining seconds before the “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated, the pedestrian can make a decision on his or her ability to safely cross the street in the available time. As such, the countdown signals are expected to improve compliance with pedestrian indications and enhance pedestrian safety. A before and after evaluation methodology was utilized to determine the effectiveness of countdown pedestrian signals by comparing pedestrian behavior data collected before and after the installation of countdown pedestrian signals. Several measures of effectiveness (percentage of pedestrians initiating crossing during “Walk,” flashing “Don’t Walk” and steady “Don’t Walk” indications, and the percentage of successful crossings) were evaluated. The results of this evaluation indicated that the pedestrian countdown signals were effective in increasing the percentage of successful crossings and decreasing the percentage of pedestrians who initiate crossing during the flashing “Don’t Walk” indication. However, the percentage of pedestrians entering during the steady “Don’t Walk” indication increased at some locations. Since the results are based on only eight intersections, further research is recommended to confirm the findings from this study. In addition, it is recommended that pedestrian crash data at the study intersections be compared once sufficient crash data for the after period become available to quantify the impacts of countdown signals on pedestrian safety.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Broward County Traffic Engineering Division and the City of Boca Raton replaced traditional pedestrian signals at eight intersections located in the South Florida area with countdown pedestrian signals. The countdown pedestrian signal is comprised of the same three indications as the conventional pedestrian signal. The flashing “Don’t Walk” indication, however, is complemented by an illuminated number indicating the number of seconds before the steady “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated and thus provides feedback to pedestrians on the time remaining in their crossing. By advising the pedestrian of the remaining seconds before the “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated, the pedestrian can make a decision on his or her ability to safely cross the street in the available time. As such, the countdown signals are expected to improve compliance with pedestrian indications and enhance pedestrian safety. A before and after evaluation methodology was utilized to determine the effectiveness of countdown pedestrian signals by comparing pedestrian behavior data collected before and after the installation of countdown pedestrian signals. Several measures of effectiveness (percentage of pedestrians initiating crossing during “Walk,” flashing “Don’t Walk” and steady “Don’t Walk” indications, and the percentage of successful crossings) were evaluated. The results of this evaluation indicated that the pedestrian countdown signals were effective in increasing the percentage of successful crossings and decreasing the percentage of pedestrians who initiate crossing during the flashing “Don’t Walk” indication. However, the percentage of pedestrians entering during the steady “Don’t Walk” indication increased at some locations. Since the results are based on only eight intersections, further research is recommended to confirm the findings from this study. In addition, it is recommended that pedestrian crash data at the study intersections be compared once sufficient crash data for the after period become available to quantify the impacts of countdown signals on pedestrian safety.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Broward County Traffic Engineering Division and the City of Boca Raton replaced traditional pedestrian signals at eight intersections located in the South Florida area with countdown pedestrian signals. The countdown pedestrian signal is comprised of the same three indications as the conventional pedestrian signal. The flashing “Don’t Walk” indication, however, is complemented by an illuminated number indicating the number of seconds before the steady “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated and thus provides feedback to pedestrians on the time remaining in their crossing. By advising the pedestrian of the remaining seconds before the “Don’t Walk” indication will be illuminated, the pedestrian can make a decision on his or her ability to safely cross the street in the available time. As such, the countdown signals are expected to improve compliance with pedestrian indications and enhance pedestrian safety. A before and after evaluation methodology was utilized to determine the effectiveness of countdown pedestrian signals by comparing pedestrian behavior data collected before and after the installation of countdown pedestrian signals. Several measures of effectiveness (percentage of pedestrians initiating crossing during “Walk,” flashing “Don’t Walk” and steady “Don’t Walk” indications, and the percentage of successful crossings) were evaluated. The results of this evaluation indicated that the pedestrian countdown signals were effective in increasing the percentage of successful crossings and decreasing the percentage of pedestrians who initiate crossing during the flashing “Don’t Walk” indication. However, the percentage of pedestrians entering during the steady “Don’t Walk” indication increased at some locations. Since the results are based on only eight intersections, further research is recommended to confirm the findings from this study. In addition, it is recommended that pedestrian crash data at the study intersections be compared once sufficient crash data for the after period become available to quantify the impacts of countdown signals on pedestrian safety.

Key concepts: Countdown, Pedestrian, Pedestrian crossing, Transport engineering, Intersection (aeronautics), Schema crosswalk, Simulation, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Innovative Safety Treatments. Volume 5: A Study of the Effectiveness of Countdown Pedestrian Signals — Research Paper | ScholarLens