2014Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 149 citations

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary philosophy and tort law have enjoyed a happy union at least since the publication of H.L.A. Hart and Tony Honoré’s Causation in the Law in 1959, and the relationship has never been better. Tort theory today is an exceptionally active and wide-ranging branch of legal philosophy. This volume of nineteen original chapters showcases the latest work by established and emerging tort theorists, as well as philosophers outside of tort theory focusing their analytical powers on issues central to the law of torts. It will be sure to deepen and broaden the philosophical study of tort law and will help set the agenda in tort theory for many years to come. The volume is divided into four parts. Part I, examines a wide variety of fundamental principles and theories of tort law. Part II, ranges over the nature of harm, the grounds of repair, accountability and the nature and limits of one’s responsibility wrongfully injuring others, and the justification of punitive damages. Part III, includes a pair of chapters exploring precisely that relationship, while Part IV, includes a pair of chapters that questions, respectively, the soundness of the signal tort of negligence and the stability of tort law as a whole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Contemporary philosophy and tort law have enjoyed a happy union at least since the publication of H.L.A. Hart and Tony Honoré’s Causation in the Law in 1959, and the relationship has never been better. Tort theory today is an exceptionally active and wide-ranging branch of legal philosophy. This volume of nineteen original chapters showcases the latest work by established and emerging tort theorists, as well as philosophers outside of tort theory focusing their analytical powers on issues central to the law of torts. It will be sure to deepen and broaden the philosophical study of tort law and will help set the agenda in tort theory for many years to come. The volume is divided into four parts. Part I, examines a wide variety of fundamental principles and theories of tort law. Part II, ranges over the nature of harm, the grounds of repair, accountability and the nature and limits of one’s responsibility wrongfully injuring others, and the justification of punitive damages. Part III, includes a pair of chapters exploring precisely that relationship, while Part IV, includes a pair of chapters that questions, respectively, the soundness of the signal tort of negligence and the stability of tort law as a whole.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 149 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Contemporary philosophy and tort law have enjoyed a happy union at least since the publication of H.L.A. Hart and Tony Honoré’s Causation in the Law in 1959, and the relationship has never been better. Tort theory today is an exceptionally active and wide-ranging branch of legal philosophy. This volume of nineteen original chapters showcases the latest work by established and emerging tort theorists, as well as philosophers outside of tort theory focusing their analytical powers on issues central to the law of torts. It will be sure to deepen and broaden the philosophical study of tort law and will help set the agenda in tort theory for many years to come. The volume is divided into four parts. Part I, examines a wide variety of fundamental principles and theories of tort law. Part II, ranges over the nature of harm, the grounds of repair, accountability and the nature and limits of one’s responsibility wrongfully injuring others, and the justification of punitive damages. Part III, includes a pair of chapters exploring precisely that relationship, while Part IV, includes a pair of chapters that questions, respectively, the soundness of the signal tort of negligence and the stability of tort law as a whole.

Key concepts: Tort, Law, Punitive damages, Political science, Philosophy of law, Philosophy, Sociology, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts — Research Paper | ScholarLens