2010Acta chirurgica BelgicaRequires access

How Should we Treat Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasm ? By Laparoscopy or Laparotomy ?: A Case Report

Gabriel Liberale, Ph. Lemaitre, D. Noterman, Carine Moerman, Filip De Neubourg, Nicolas Sirtaine, Issam El Nakadi

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

Appendicular mucocele (AM) usually denotes a dilatation of the appendiceal lumen as a result of mucus accumulation that may be related to various neoplastic and non-neoplastic processes. Most of them are discovered incidentally. Treatment consists in complete resection avoiding rupture of the cyst in the peritoneal cavity. Indeed, rupture of such a cystic lesion in the peritoneal cavity can induce a catastrophic complication such as 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' (PMP). Therefore, some authors recommend an open surgical treatment. Currently, the debate concerning the best surgical technique to adopt for AM remains controversial. We report a case of AM found incidentally and treated by laparoscopy. The macroscopic aspect of the appendix suggested the diagnosis intra-operatively and every effort was made to avoid cystic rupture during appendicular resection. The histopathological diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma. The patient is doing well at 2-year follow-up. The reported case and literature review show us that AM is not a contra-indication for laparoscopic surgery, but major concern resides in the early recognition of such a lesion at laparoscopy and in taking appropriate precautionary measures to avoid rupture in the peritoneal cavity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Appendicular mucocele (AM) usually denotes a dilatation of the appendiceal lumen as a result of mucus accumulation that may be related to various neoplastic and non-neoplastic processes. Most of them are discovered incidentally. Treatment consists in complete resection avoiding rupture of the cyst in the peritoneal cavity. Indeed, rupture of such a cystic lesion in the peritoneal cavity can induce a catastrophic complication such as 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' (PMP). Therefore, some authors recommend an open surgical treatment. Currently, the debate concerning the best surgical technique to adopt for AM remains controversial. We report a case of AM found incidentally and treated by laparoscopy. The macroscopic aspect of the appendix suggested the diagnosis intra-operatively and every effort was made to avoid cystic rupture during appendicular resection. The histopathological diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma. The patient is doing well at 2-year follow-up. The reported case and literature review show us that AM is not a contra-indication for laparoscopic surgery, but major concern resides in the early recognition of such a lesion at laparoscopy and in taking appropriate precautionary measures to avoid rupture in the peritoneal cavity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Appendicular mucocele (AM) usually denotes a dilatation of the appendiceal lumen as a result of mucus accumulation that may be related to various neoplastic and non-neoplastic processes. Most of them are discovered incidentally. Treatment consists in complete resection avoiding rupture of the cyst in the peritoneal cavity. Indeed, rupture of such a cystic lesion in the peritoneal cavity can induce a catastrophic complication such as 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' (PMP). Therefore, some authors recommend an open surgical treatment. Currently, the debate concerning the best surgical technique to adopt for AM remains controversial. We report a case of AM found incidentally and treated by laparoscopy. The macroscopic aspect of the appendix suggested the diagnosis intra-operatively and every effort was made to avoid cystic rupture during appendicular resection. The histopathological diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma. The patient is doing well at 2-year follow-up. The reported case and literature review show us that AM is not a contra-indication for laparoscopic surgery, but major concern resides in the early recognition of such a lesion at laparoscopy and in taking appropriate precautionary measures to avoid rupture in the peritoneal cavity.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, General surgery, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Should we Treat Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasm ? By Laparoscopy or Laparotomy ?: A Case Report — Research Paper | ScholarLens