Intrastate Regulation and interstate motor carriers
Β. Starr McMullen, Philip B. Schary, McMullen, B. Starr, Schary, Philip
Abstract
Open-access reader
Β. Starr McMullen, Philip B. Schary, McMullen, B. Starr, Schary, Philip
Abstract
Open-access reader
Although regulatory reform in the motor carrier industry has proceeded rapidly at the federal level, many states retain strict regulatory control over intrastate operations.The issue addressed here is whether intrastate regulation has enabled carriers engaging in intrastate commerce to receive higher rates and achieve higher profit than obtainable in the less regulated interstate markets.Empirical evidence, using data from the strictly regulated state of Oregon, suggests that state regulation has not been successful in attaining these goals.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although regulatory reform in the motor carrier industry has proceeded rapidly at the federal level, many states retain strict regulatory control over intrastate operations.The issue addressed here is whether intrastate regulation has enabled carriers engaging in intrastate commerce to receive higher rates and achieve higher profit than obtainable in the less regulated interstate markets.Empirical evidence, using data from the strictly regulated state of Oregon, suggests that state regulation has not been successful in attaining these goals.
Key concepts: Motor carrier, Business, Law and economics, Economics, Engineering, Truck, Aerospace engineering