2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Private participation in infrastructure : a review of the evidence

Philip Gray

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Infrastructure services play a critical role in development, with direct and indirect linkages to living standards, and economic growth. Until de 1990s, most developing countries relied on public sector monopolies to finance, and operate their infrastructure, with disappointing results, with technical inefficiencies estimates causing significant losses. Under public provision, services are often mispriced to meet short-term political goals, leading to additional losses. However, countries around the world have been turning to the private sector, both to finance, and operate new infrastructure assets, expected to offer a number of benefits, namely access to finance for service expansion, to improve incentives for efficiency, and to reduce the burden on public resources. This paper reviews the evidence on the extent to which these objectives have been achieved. As a background to the discussion, Part A provides a brief review of the trends in private participation in developing countries' infrastructure; Part B reviews the evidence from the privatization of, and concessions to existing infrastructure enterprises; Part C looks at some of the evidence from private financing of new assets; and, Part D draws on that evidence to highlight key lessons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Infrastructure services play a critical role in development, with direct and indirect linkages to living standards, and economic growth. Until de 1990s, most developing countries relied on public sector monopolies to finance, and operate their infrastructure, with disappointing results, with technical inefficiencies estimates causing significant losses. Under public provision, services are often mispriced to meet short-term political goals, leading to additional losses. However, countries around the world have been turning to the private sector, both to finance, and operate new infrastructure assets, expected to offer a number of benefits, namely access to finance for service expansion, to improve incentives for efficiency, and to reduce the burden on public resources. This paper reviews the evidence on the extent to which these objectives have been achieved. As a background to the discussion, Part A provides a brief review of the trends in private participation in developing countries' infrastructure; Part B reviews the evidence from the privatization of, and concessions to existing infrastructure enterprises; Part C looks at some of the evidence from private financing of new assets; and, Part D draws on that evidence to highlight key lessons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Infrastructure services play a critical role in development, with direct and indirect linkages to living standards, and economic growth. Until de 1990s, most developing countries relied on public sector monopolies to finance, and operate their infrastructure, with disappointing results, with technical inefficiencies estimates causing significant losses. Under public provision, services are often mispriced to meet short-term political goals, leading to additional losses. However, countries around the world have been turning to the private sector, both to finance, and operate new infrastructure assets, expected to offer a number of benefits, namely access to finance for service expansion, to improve incentives for efficiency, and to reduce the burden on public resources. This paper reviews the evidence on the extent to which these objectives have been achieved. As a background to the discussion, Part A provides a brief review of the trends in private participation in developing countries' infrastructure; Part B reviews the evidence from the privatization of, and concessions to existing infrastructure enterprises; Part C looks at some of the evidence from private financing of new assets; and, Part D draws on that evidence to highlight key lessons.

Key concepts: Developing country, Incentive, Private sector, Business, Finance, Critical infrastructure, Public infrastructure, Public sector

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Private participation in infrastructure : a review of the evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens