2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Guidelines for evaluation of highway pavements for rehabilitation

Kathleen T. Hall, Carlos E. Correa, Samuel H. Carpenter, Robert P Elliott

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the project-level evaluation process described in the Guide for Selection of Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies, developed under NCHRP Project 1-38. The guidelines for pavement data collection address pavement section inventory, traffic analysis, distress surveying, nondestructive deflection testing, materials sampling and testing, profile and roughness measurement, friction measurement, drainage inspection, and other nondestructive testing. The guidelines for project-level pavement evaluation address distress evaluation, structural evaluation, and functional evaluation, drainage evaluation, and identification of uniform sections. Trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a structural improvement. Similarly, trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a functional improvement. The results of the distress, structural, functional, and drainage evaluations lead directly into the selection of appropriate rehabilitation techniques for each of the three main pavement types considered, combination of the individual rehabilitation techniques into one or more feasible rehabilitation strategy alternatives, life-cycle cost analysis of the alternatives, and selection of a rehabilitation strategy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an overview of the project-level evaluation process described in the Guide for Selection of Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies, developed under NCHRP Project 1-38. The guidelines for pavement data collection address pavement section inventory, traffic analysis, distress surveying, nondestructive deflection testing, materials sampling and testing, profile and roughness measurement, friction measurement, drainage inspection, and other nondestructive testing. The guidelines for project-level pavement evaluation address distress evaluation, structural evaluation, and functional evaluation, drainage evaluation, and identification of uniform sections. Trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a structural improvement. Similarly, trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a functional improvement. The results of the distress, structural, functional, and drainage evaluations lead directly into the selection of appropriate rehabilitation techniques for each of the three main pavement types considered, combination of the individual rehabilitation techniques into one or more feasible rehabilitation strategy alternatives, life-cycle cost analysis of the alternatives, and selection of a rehabilitation strategy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an overview of the project-level evaluation process described in the Guide for Selection of Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies, developed under NCHRP Project 1-38. The guidelines for pavement data collection address pavement section inventory, traffic analysis, distress surveying, nondestructive deflection testing, materials sampling and testing, profile and roughness measurement, friction measurement, drainage inspection, and other nondestructive testing. The guidelines for project-level pavement evaluation address distress evaluation, structural evaluation, and functional evaluation, drainage evaluation, and identification of uniform sections. Trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a structural improvement. Similarly, trigger values are suggested for key condition levels at which a pavement is generally considered to need a functional improvement. The results of the distress, structural, functional, and drainage evaluations lead directly into the selection of appropriate rehabilitation techniques for each of the three main pavement types considered, combination of the individual rehabilitation techniques into one or more feasible rehabilitation strategy alternatives, life-cycle cost analysis of the alternatives, and selection of a rehabilitation strategy.

Key concepts: Rehabilitation, Driver rehabilitation, Engineering, Pavement engineering, Nondestructive testing, Pavement management, Forensic engineering, Civil engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Guidelines for evaluation of highway pavements for rehabilitation — Research Paper | ScholarLens