200815th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America's 2008 Annual MeetingITS AmericaERTICOITS JapanTransCoreRequires access

Benefit - Cost Evaluation Techniques for Rural Its Deployments

Daniel Krechmer, Gregory Krueger, Mark Dunzo, Jeff Dale, Christopher Hedden

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper describes the benefit-cost evaluation techniques that are being used for rural Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) deployment. The authors use the recently-completed Michigan Department of Transportation's ITS architectures and predeployment plans for five of the State’s seven Department of Transportation (DOT) regions. These studies were collaborative efforts that involved a wide range of stakeholders. Most of the facilities covered in these studies were in either rural regions or small urban areas. Needs identified by the stakeholders and proposed solutions differed in many ways from those proposed for major urban areas. The project team had to develop techniques for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these alternative investments, since most of the literature in this area was based on urban ITS programs. The authors describe some of the alternatives developed in four of the study regions (Superior, North, Grand, Bay) and some of the techniques developed for evaluation. They conclude with a brief discussion of three recommendations to include benefit-cost analysis: close cooperation between law enforcement and transportation departments in developing rural transportation management centers; tracking the impacts of improved weather information on winter maintenance; and information on the use of traveler information in rural regions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes the benefit-cost evaluation techniques that are being used for rural Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) deployment. The authors use the recently-completed Michigan Department of Transportation's ITS architectures and predeployment plans for five of the State’s seven Department of Transportation (DOT) regions. These studies were collaborative efforts that involved a wide range of stakeholders. Most of the facilities covered in these studies were in either rural regions or small urban areas. Needs identified by the stakeholders and proposed solutions differed in many ways from those proposed for major urban areas. The project team had to develop techniques for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these alternative investments, since most of the literature in this area was based on urban ITS programs. The authors describe some of the alternatives developed in four of the study regions (Superior, North, Grand, Bay) and some of the techniques developed for evaluation. They conclude with a brief discussion of three recommendations to include benefit-cost analysis: close cooperation between law enforcement and transportation departments in developing rural transportation management centers; tracking the impacts of improved weather information on winter maintenance; and information on the use of traveler information in rural regions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes the benefit-cost evaluation techniques that are being used for rural Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) deployment. The authors use the recently-completed Michigan Department of Transportation's ITS architectures and predeployment plans for five of the State’s seven Department of Transportation (DOT) regions. These studies were collaborative efforts that involved a wide range of stakeholders. Most of the facilities covered in these studies were in either rural regions or small urban areas. Needs identified by the stakeholders and proposed solutions differed in many ways from those proposed for major urban areas. The project team had to develop techniques for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these alternative investments, since most of the literature in this area was based on urban ITS programs. The authors describe some of the alternatives developed in four of the study regions (Superior, North, Grand, Bay) and some of the techniques developed for evaluation. They conclude with a brief discussion of three recommendations to include benefit-cost analysis: close cooperation between law enforcement and transportation departments in developing rural transportation management centers; tracking the impacts of improved weather information on winter maintenance; and information on the use of traveler information in rural regions.

Key concepts: Software deployment, Transport engineering, Business, Intelligent transportation system, Cost–benefit analysis, Law enforcement, Environmental planning, Rural area

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Benefit - Cost Evaluation Techniques for Rural Its Deployments — Research Paper | ScholarLens