2009HPC Bridge ViewsRequires access

High Performance Concrete in Colorado

Andrew Pott, Jamal Elkaissi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article reviews the technology advances and performance requirements that continue to raise the bar for high performance concrete. The author describes the Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) activities using higher performance concrete (HPC) in bridge decks that use Class H and HT concretes. These concretes are used for bridge decks that do not receive a waterproofing membrane. The author describes specific challenges including how to achieve lower permeabilities and less cracking in bridge decks or higher compressive strengths for girders. Lower permeability was obtained with the addition of fly ash and silica fume and lower cement content. The lower permeability helps slow the ingress of moisture and chlorides thus protecting the reinforcing steel. The lower cement content helps reduce shrinkage cracking. The addition of fly ash and silica fume also provided higher strength to offset the lower cement content. The author concludes with a section of lessons learned, focusing on the idea that no matter how high performance a concrete may be, the use of poor construction practices will result in poorly performing concrete. The use of HPC must be teamed with proper design and construction practices. Readers are referred to the website for CDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridge Construction (http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/Construction/2005SpecsBook/2005Book/sec601.pdf).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article reviews the technology advances and performance requirements that continue to raise the bar for high performance concrete. The author describes the Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) activities using higher performance concrete (HPC) in bridge decks that use Class H and HT concretes. These concretes are used for bridge decks that do not receive a waterproofing membrane. The author describes specific challenges including how to achieve lower permeabilities and less cracking in bridge decks or higher compressive strengths for girders. Lower permeability was obtained with the addition of fly ash and silica fume and lower cement content. The lower permeability helps slow the ingress of moisture and chlorides thus protecting the reinforcing steel. The lower cement content helps reduce shrinkage cracking. The addition of fly ash and silica fume also provided higher strength to offset the lower cement content. The author concludes with a section of lessons learned, focusing on the idea that no matter how high performance a concrete may be, the use of poor construction practices will result in poorly performing concrete. The use of HPC must be teamed with proper design and construction practices. Readers are referred to the website for CDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridge Construction (http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/Construction/2005SpecsBook/2005Book/sec601.pdf).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article reviews the technology advances and performance requirements that continue to raise the bar for high performance concrete. The author describes the Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) activities using higher performance concrete (HPC) in bridge decks that use Class H and HT concretes. These concretes are used for bridge decks that do not receive a waterproofing membrane. The author describes specific challenges including how to achieve lower permeabilities and less cracking in bridge decks or higher compressive strengths for girders. Lower permeability was obtained with the addition of fly ash and silica fume and lower cement content. The lower permeability helps slow the ingress of moisture and chlorides thus protecting the reinforcing steel. The lower cement content helps reduce shrinkage cracking. The addition of fly ash and silica fume also provided higher strength to offset the lower cement content. The author concludes with a section of lessons learned, focusing on the idea that no matter how high performance a concrete may be, the use of poor construction practices will result in poorly performing concrete. The use of HPC must be teamed with proper design and construction practices. Readers are referred to the website for CDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridge Construction (http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/Construction/2005SpecsBook/2005Book/sec601.pdf).

Key concepts: Waterproofing, Silica fume, Fly ash, Precast concrete, Cement, Cracking, Girder, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High Performance Concrete in Colorado — Research Paper | ScholarLens