TRANSIT AND SHOPPING CENTRES--CAN THEY CO-EXIST?
Richard S Tebinka
Abstract
Richard S Tebinka
Abstract
Winnipeg Transit has provided service to three regional shopping centres on a regular basis, with anywhere from two to six routes. Initial misgivings by transit operations staff have changed to enthusiasm for the transit facilities. Pedestrians conflicts have been less than anticipated and the transit operators now feel that the protective fencing is not required. Given the positive results for both parties, additional transit facilities on shopping center property may be implemented. In order to maximize the benefits to transit and reduce conflicts between customers and transit vehicles, ideally a totally exclusive facility should be provided, if feasible.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Winnipeg Transit has provided service to three regional shopping centres on a regular basis, with anywhere from two to six routes. Initial misgivings by transit operations staff have changed to enthusiasm for the transit facilities. Pedestrians conflicts have been less than anticipated and the transit operators now feel that the protective fencing is not required. Given the positive results for both parties, additional transit facilities on shopping center property may be implemented. In order to maximize the benefits to transit and reduce conflicts between customers and transit vehicles, ideally a totally exclusive facility should be provided, if feasible.
Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Business, Order (exchange), Transport engineering, Service (business), Urban transit, Rail transit, Advertising