2006Indian highwaysRequires access

Modified AASHTO method for design of geogrids reinforced flexible pavements

Mohamed Kamel, S. Chandra, Pvsn Pavan Kumar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The modified AASHTO method of reinforced flexible pavements has recommended the use of geosynthetic material in reinforcing the base course road. The use of the modified AASHTO method for the design of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements was studied. Three soils were used: fine sand, silty and clayey. River Bed Material was used in the subbase layer and Water Bound Macadam was used for the base course. Two types of geogrids were used to reinforce the pavement layers. Compaction tests were conducted to determine the maximum dry density and the optimum moisture contents for subgrade soils and the base and subbase materials. Cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on unreinforced and reinforced samples of subgrade soils, subbase and base materials. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were conducted on subgrade soils only. Correlations between the resilient modulus and CBR soils were examined. The resilient modulus was determined for subgrade, base and subbase with and without reinforcement and the structural layer coefficient for each layer was determined. The results showed that including geogrids in the subgrade, subbase or base course could reduce the thickness of these layers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The modified AASHTO method of reinforced flexible pavements has recommended the use of geosynthetic material in reinforcing the base course road. The use of the modified AASHTO method for the design of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements was studied. Three soils were used: fine sand, silty and clayey. River Bed Material was used in the subbase layer and Water Bound Macadam was used for the base course. Two types of geogrids were used to reinforce the pavement layers. Compaction tests were conducted to determine the maximum dry density and the optimum moisture contents for subgrade soils and the base and subbase materials. Cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on unreinforced and reinforced samples of subgrade soils, subbase and base materials. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were conducted on subgrade soils only. Correlations between the resilient modulus and CBR soils were examined. The resilient modulus was determined for subgrade, base and subbase with and without reinforcement and the structural layer coefficient for each layer was determined. The results showed that including geogrids in the subgrade, subbase or base course could reduce the thickness of these layers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The modified AASHTO method of reinforced flexible pavements has recommended the use of geosynthetic material in reinforcing the base course road. The use of the modified AASHTO method for the design of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements was studied. Three soils were used: fine sand, silty and clayey. River Bed Material was used in the subbase layer and Water Bound Macadam was used for the base course. Two types of geogrids were used to reinforce the pavement layers. Compaction tests were conducted to determine the maximum dry density and the optimum moisture contents for subgrade soils and the base and subbase materials. Cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on unreinforced and reinforced samples of subgrade soils, subbase and base materials. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were conducted on subgrade soils only. Correlations between the resilient modulus and CBR soils were examined. The resilient modulus was determined for subgrade, base and subbase with and without reinforcement and the structural layer coefficient for each layer was determined. The results showed that including geogrids in the subgrade, subbase or base course could reduce the thickness of these layers.

Key concepts: Subbase, Subgrade, Geotechnical engineering, Geogrid, Compaction, California bearing ratio, Soil water, Base course

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modified AASHTO method for design of geogrids reinforced flexible pavements — Research Paper | ScholarLens