2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Managing Curb Space on Arterial Streets: Making the Case for Fast and Reliable Transit Service in a Mixed Flow Environment

Ryan Abbotts

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

How a city manages roadway right-of-way has a major impact on the character and function of transit service. Good transit service is a key part of any City’s growth management strategy and maximizing person moving capacity of existing roadways. Bus rapid transit has the potential to attract new riders to transit and provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicle trips. To capture more riders, the bus rapid transit service will need to provide travel time savings and reliability, increase the frequency and span of service, and have a distinct identity and image. This paper examines some of the technical and policy support for a wide range of transit treatments and the critical criteria for decision-making. Examples from Seattle will be used to demonstrate how key transit treatments require buy-in and how these issues were framed for discussion. This paper will outline transit treatments available for making transit fast and reliable; show how these treatments where selected for implementation, with a focus on KC Metro Transit’s (Seattle area) method for RapidRide (bus rapid transit) improvements; discuss the proposed queue jump selection methodology for PACE Bus (Chicago area); and will include discussions from past projects relating to transit treatments which have led to an understanding about bus rapid transit in a mixed flow environment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

How a city manages roadway right-of-way has a major impact on the character and function of transit service. Good transit service is a key part of any City’s growth management strategy and maximizing person moving capacity of existing roadways. Bus rapid transit has the potential to attract new riders to transit and provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicle trips. To capture more riders, the bus rapid transit service will need to provide travel time savings and reliability, increase the frequency and span of service, and have a distinct identity and image. This paper examines some of the technical and policy support for a wide range of transit treatments and the critical criteria for decision-making. Examples from Seattle will be used to demonstrate how key transit treatments require buy-in and how these issues were framed for discussion. This paper will outline transit treatments available for making transit fast and reliable; show how these treatments where selected for implementation, with a focus on KC Metro Transit’s (Seattle area) method for RapidRide (bus rapid transit) improvements; discuss the proposed queue jump selection methodology for PACE Bus (Chicago area); and will include discussions from past projects relating to transit treatments which have led to an understanding about bus rapid transit in a mixed flow environment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

How a city manages roadway right-of-way has a major impact on the character and function of transit service. Good transit service is a key part of any City’s growth management strategy and maximizing person moving capacity of existing roadways. Bus rapid transit has the potential to attract new riders to transit and provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicle trips. To capture more riders, the bus rapid transit service will need to provide travel time savings and reliability, increase the frequency and span of service, and have a distinct identity and image. This paper examines some of the technical and policy support for a wide range of transit treatments and the critical criteria for decision-making. Examples from Seattle will be used to demonstrate how key transit treatments require buy-in and how these issues were framed for discussion. This paper will outline transit treatments available for making transit fast and reliable; show how these treatments where selected for implementation, with a focus on KC Metro Transit’s (Seattle area) method for RapidRide (bus rapid transit) improvements; discuss the proposed queue jump selection methodology for PACE Bus (Chicago area); and will include discussions from past projects relating to transit treatments which have led to an understanding about bus rapid transit in a mixed flow environment.

Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Service (business), Public transport, TRIPS architecture, Pace, Bus rapid transit, Bus priority

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Managing Curb Space on Arterial Streets: Making the Case for Fast and Reliable Transit Service in a Mixed Flow Environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens