1958Highway Research RecordRequires access

PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN A HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

K L Bergstralh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

SOME OF THE PRINCIPLES DISCUSSED ARE (1) ONCE AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY DELEGATED AVOID REASSIGNING THEM UPWARDS IN THE ORGANIZATION, (2) ESTABLISH A SYSTEM OF PRIORITY OF IMPORTANCE AND DELEGATE ACCORDINGLY, (3) FORCE SUBORDINATES TO MAKE DECISIONS ON MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN DELEGATED TO THEM, (4) WHEN SERVING ON A COMMITTEE, FORCE THE COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP A FINAL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION, (5) FORCE THE INTERMEDIATE SUPERVISORS TO DELEGATE, (6) RE-EVALUATE THE POSITION OF THE ASSISTANT DIVISION HEAD AND ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER, (7) DELETE AND GUARD AGAINST UNNECESSARY REVIEWS AND CHECKS, AND (8) HONOR RATHER THAN UNDERMINE THE PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SOME OF THE PRINCIPLES DISCUSSED ARE (1) ONCE AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY DELEGATED AVOID REASSIGNING THEM UPWARDS IN THE ORGANIZATION, (2) ESTABLISH A SYSTEM OF PRIORITY OF IMPORTANCE AND DELEGATE ACCORDINGLY, (3) FORCE SUBORDINATES TO MAKE DECISIONS ON MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN DELEGATED TO THEM, (4) WHEN SERVING ON A COMMITTEE, FORCE THE COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP A FINAL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION, (5) FORCE THE INTERMEDIATE SUPERVISORS TO DELEGATE, (6) RE-EVALUATE THE POSITION OF THE ASSISTANT DIVISION HEAD AND ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER, (7) DELETE AND GUARD AGAINST UNNECESSARY REVIEWS AND CHECKS, AND (8) HONOR RATHER THAN UNDERMINE THE PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SOME OF THE PRINCIPLES DISCUSSED ARE (1) ONCE AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVELY DELEGATED AVOID REASSIGNING THEM UPWARDS IN THE ORGANIZATION, (2) ESTABLISH A SYSTEM OF PRIORITY OF IMPORTANCE AND DELEGATE ACCORDINGLY, (3) FORCE SUBORDINATES TO MAKE DECISIONS ON MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN DELEGATED TO THEM, (4) WHEN SERVING ON A COMMITTEE, FORCE THE COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP A FINAL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION, (5) FORCE THE INTERMEDIATE SUPERVISORS TO DELEGATE, (6) RE-EVALUATE THE POSITION OF THE ASSISTANT DIVISION HEAD AND ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER, (7) DELETE AND GUARD AGAINST UNNECESSARY REVIEWS AND CHECKS, AND (8) HONOR RATHER THAN UNDERMINE THE PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION.

Key concepts: Delegate, Delegation, Delegated authority, Guard (computer science), Honor, Position (finance), Engineering, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PRINCIPLES OF DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN A HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens