2012•2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIESRequires access

Examination of Pedestrian Crosswalk Design at Roundabouts

Phillip A. Weber

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study uses a rational approach to examine three elements of pedestrian design at roundabouts - crosswalk location, crosswalk angle, and exit design - and attempts to recommend how they could be implemented to achieve the best possible balance of pedestrian safety and convenience. This was done using the following objectives: maximize visibility; minimize impacts of vehicle queues; minimize walking distances; minimize pedestrian exposure in the crosswalk; minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and ; maximize pedestrian refuge width. The evaluation shows that the only clear preference in terms of pedestrian design at a roundabout is that a crosswalk be located one passenger car length from the roundabout on the exit side as opposed to two. This was because it was shown to minimize walking distances, minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and maximize pedestrian refuge width in the splitter island. There was determined to be no overall preference between straight and angled crosswalks, and no overall difference between a curved and a more tangential exit design. The evaluation was undertaken for an example two-lane roundabout. It is possible that different results may be obtained with different geometric designs. It is also possible that different results may be obtained with a different evaluation procedure that assigns weights to the study objectives based on their level of pedestrian safety or convenience. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study uses a rational approach to examine three elements of pedestrian design at roundabouts - crosswalk location, crosswalk angle, and exit design - and attempts to recommend how they could be implemented to achieve the best possible balance of pedestrian safety and convenience. This was done using the following objectives: maximize visibility; minimize impacts of vehicle queues; minimize walking distances; minimize pedestrian exposure in the crosswalk; minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and ; maximize pedestrian refuge width. The evaluation shows that the only clear preference in terms of pedestrian design at a roundabout is that a crosswalk be located one passenger car length from the roundabout on the exit side as opposed to two. This was because it was shown to minimize walking distances, minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and maximize pedestrian refuge width in the splitter island. There was determined to be no overall preference between straight and angled crosswalks, and no overall difference between a curved and a more tangential exit design. The evaluation was undertaken for an example two-lane roundabout. It is possible that different results may be obtained with different geometric designs. It is also possible that different results may be obtained with a different evaluation procedure that assigns weights to the study objectives based on their level of pedestrian safety or convenience. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study uses a rational approach to examine three elements of pedestrian design at roundabouts - crosswalk location, crosswalk angle, and exit design - and attempts to recommend how they could be implemented to achieve the best possible balance of pedestrian safety and convenience. This was done using the following objectives: maximize visibility; minimize impacts of vehicle queues; minimize walking distances; minimize pedestrian exposure in the crosswalk; minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and ; maximize pedestrian refuge width. The evaluation shows that the only clear preference in terms of pedestrian design at a roundabout is that a crosswalk be located one passenger car length from the roundabout on the exit side as opposed to two. This was because it was shown to minimize walking distances, minimize vehicle speeds through the crosswalk, and maximize pedestrian refuge width in the splitter island. There was determined to be no overall preference between straight and angled crosswalks, and no overall difference between a curved and a more tangential exit design. The evaluation was undertaken for an example two-lane roundabout. It is possible that different results may be obtained with different geometric designs. It is also possible that different results may be obtained with a different evaluation procedure that assigns weights to the study objectives based on their level of pedestrian safety or convenience. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.

Key concepts: Schema crosswalk, Roundabout, Pedestrian, Transport engineering, Visibility, Pedestrian crossing, Geometric design, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examination of Pedestrian Crosswalk Design at Roundabouts — Research Paper | ScholarLens