2010European Transport Conference, 2010Association for European Transport (AET)Requires access

Freight Impacts on Metropolitan Regions: US and European Findings and Responses

Eric Petersen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of freight in United States (US) metropolitan regions, beginning with a statistical overview of freight movements and their impact on congestion and safety as well as economic growth. The impacts by individual freight mode are examined in more detail in the paper. As expected, regions with a robust rail freight delivery system have slightly lesser congestion-related impacts due to freight movements. Curiously, regions with a high share of water-based freight movements (for internal freight movements) also have higher levels of economic and social inequality, though these are most likely due to specific geographic properties of the US and are unlikely to be directly related to water-borne freight systems. The paper repeats the analysis for major European metropolitan regions, examining where the impacts are similar and where different from the US context. Of particular interest is if the water-borne freight shares any of the same correlations on urban inequality as its US counterpart. The paper ends with a discussion of how different impacts have lead to different formulations of the problem in Europe and the US. For instance, city logistics is only gradually coming to the attention of US policy makers. Similarly, detailed accounting for the emissions-impacts of freight is prevalent in Europe but not in the US. In fact, the debate over freight in the US almost always assumes that increasing freight movements to and from a region will be beneficial to all residents, whereas the issue is far from settled. The costs and impacts of freight, particularly on urban areas, are weighted more heavily in Europe in setting freight policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the impacts of freight in United States (US) metropolitan regions, beginning with a statistical overview of freight movements and their impact on congestion and safety as well as economic growth. The impacts by individual freight mode are examined in more detail in the paper. As expected, regions with a robust rail freight delivery system have slightly lesser congestion-related impacts due to freight movements. Curiously, regions with a high share of water-based freight movements (for internal freight movements) also have higher levels of economic and social inequality, though these are most likely due to specific geographic properties of the US and are unlikely to be directly related to water-borne freight systems. The paper repeats the analysis for major European metropolitan regions, examining where the impacts are similar and where different from the US context. Of particular interest is if the water-borne freight shares any of the same correlations on urban inequality as its US counterpart. The paper ends with a discussion of how different impacts have lead to different formulations of the problem in Europe and the US. For instance, city logistics is only gradually coming to the attention of US policy makers. Similarly, detailed accounting for the emissions-impacts of freight is prevalent in Europe but not in the US. In fact, the debate over freight in the US almost always assumes that increasing freight movements to and from a region will be beneficial to all residents, whereas the issue is far from settled. The costs and impacts of freight, particularly on urban areas, are weighted more heavily in Europe in setting freight policy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the impacts of freight in United States (US) metropolitan regions, beginning with a statistical overview of freight movements and their impact on congestion and safety as well as economic growth. The impacts by individual freight mode are examined in more detail in the paper. As expected, regions with a robust rail freight delivery system have slightly lesser congestion-related impacts due to freight movements. Curiously, regions with a high share of water-based freight movements (for internal freight movements) also have higher levels of economic and social inequality, though these are most likely due to specific geographic properties of the US and are unlikely to be directly related to water-borne freight systems. The paper repeats the analysis for major European metropolitan regions, examining where the impacts are similar and where different from the US context. Of particular interest is if the water-borne freight shares any of the same correlations on urban inequality as its US counterpart. The paper ends with a discussion of how different impacts have lead to different formulations of the problem in Europe and the US. For instance, city logistics is only gradually coming to the attention of US policy makers. Similarly, detailed accounting for the emissions-impacts of freight is prevalent in Europe but not in the US. In fact, the debate over freight in the US almost always assumes that increasing freight movements to and from a region will be beneficial to all residents, whereas the issue is far from settled. The costs and impacts of freight, particularly on urban areas, are weighted more heavily in Europe in setting freight policy.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Context (archaeology), Inequality, Economic impact analysis, Business, Economic geography, Regional science, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Freight Impacts on Metropolitan Regions: US and European Findings and Responses — Research Paper | ScholarLens