1944NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)Requires access

A preliminary evaluation of the explosion jet-propulsion engine

J. C. Sanders

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The theoretical sea-level performance of an explosion jet-propulsion engine similar to the one used in the German flying bomb was computed to show the effects on performance of heat added and supercharging and a comparison was drawn between the performance of the explosion jet-propulsion engine and the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine. The explosion jet-propulsion engine was found to be more efficient than the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine at compressor pressure ratios below 3.0 when the maximum gas temperature of the constant-pressure engine is 1600 deg F. With more efficient compressors and higher gas temperatures, however, the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine is more efficient. The compressor for the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine absorbs more power than the compressor for the explosion jet-propulsion engine when the two engines develop the same power.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The theoretical sea-level performance of an explosion jet-propulsion engine similar to the one used in the German flying bomb was computed to show the effects on performance of heat added and supercharging and a comparison was drawn between the performance of the explosion jet-propulsion engine and the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine. The explosion jet-propulsion engine was found to be more efficient than the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine at compressor pressure ratios below 3.0 when the maximum gas temperature of the constant-pressure engine is 1600 deg F. With more efficient compressors and higher gas temperatures, however, the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine is more efficient. The compressor for the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine absorbs more power than the compressor for the explosion jet-propulsion engine when the two engines develop the same power.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The theoretical sea-level performance of an explosion jet-propulsion engine similar to the one used in the German flying bomb was computed to show the effects on performance of heat added and supercharging and a comparison was drawn between the performance of the explosion jet-propulsion engine and the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine. The explosion jet-propulsion engine was found to be more efficient than the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine at compressor pressure ratios below 3.0 when the maximum gas temperature of the constant-pressure engine is 1600 deg F. With more efficient compressors and higher gas temperatures, however, the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine is more efficient. The compressor for the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine absorbs more power than the compressor for the explosion jet-propulsion engine when the two engines develop the same power.

Key concepts: Jet propulsion, Propulsion, Jet engine, Gas compressor, Jet (fluid), Aerospace engineering, Stirling engine, Automotive engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A preliminary evaluation of the explosion jet-propulsion engine — Research Paper | ScholarLens