A preliminary evaluation of the explosion jet-propulsion engine
J. C. Sanders
Abstract
J. C. Sanders
Abstract
Abstract : The theoretical sea-level performance of an explosion jet-propulsion engine similar to the one used in the German flying bomb was computed to show the effects on performance of heat added and supercharging and a comparison was drawn between the performance of the explosion jet-propulsion engine and the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine. The explosion jet-propulsion engine was found to be more efficient than the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine at compressor pressure ratios below 3.0 when the maximum gas temperature of the constant-pressure engine is 1600 deg F. With more efficient compressors and higher gas temperatures, however, the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine is more efficient. The compressor for the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine absorbs more power than the compressor for the explosion jet-propulsion engine when the two engines develop the same power.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract : The theoretical sea-level performance of an explosion jet-propulsion engine similar to the one used in the German flying bomb was computed to show the effects on performance of heat added and supercharging and a comparison was drawn between the performance of the explosion jet-propulsion engine and the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine. The explosion jet-propulsion engine was found to be more efficient than the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine at compressor pressure ratios below 3.0 when the maximum gas temperature of the constant-pressure engine is 1600 deg F. With more efficient compressors and higher gas temperatures, however, the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine is more efficient. The compressor for the constant-pressure jet-propulsion engine absorbs more power than the compressor for the explosion jet-propulsion engine when the two engines develop the same power.
Key concepts: Jet propulsion, Propulsion, Jet engine, Gas compressor, Jet (fluid), Aerospace engineering, Stirling engine, Automotive engineering