2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Implications of Future Seismic Bridge Design Provisions for Illinois

Daniel H. Tobias, Ralph E. Anderson, Chad E. Hodel, W. Krämer, Riyad M. Wahab

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

AASHTO and the NCHRP are currently formulating new provisions for the seismic design of highway bridges. As a member of the AASHTO Seismic Design Sub-Committee (T-3), Illinois is playing an advisory role in the process. A vote by AASHTO members on adoption of these provisions into the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications or as guide specifications, in part or in full, could come in the late spring of 2007 with initial publication as early as 2008. The proposed formulation of the new provisions is quite different than those in the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications as well as the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. There are two key aspects of differentiation between the current codified provisions and the proposed which Illinois is focusing on for implementation. The design earthquake return period is increasing from 500 to 1000 years and the newly formulated method for seismic analysis and design is primarily “displacement based” as opposed to the current “force based” or “R-factor” approach. Illinois has already begun to lay the foundation for implementation of these expected provisions. The paper presents an overview of these efforts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AASHTO and the NCHRP are currently formulating new provisions for the seismic design of highway bridges. As a member of the AASHTO Seismic Design Sub-Committee (T-3), Illinois is playing an advisory role in the process. A vote by AASHTO members on adoption of these provisions into the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications or as guide specifications, in part or in full, could come in the late spring of 2007 with initial publication as early as 2008. The proposed formulation of the new provisions is quite different than those in the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications as well as the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. There are two key aspects of differentiation between the current codified provisions and the proposed which Illinois is focusing on for implementation. The design earthquake return period is increasing from 500 to 1000 years and the newly formulated method for seismic analysis and design is primarily “displacement based” as opposed to the current “force based” or “R-factor” approach. Illinois has already begun to lay the foundation for implementation of these expected provisions. The paper presents an overview of these efforts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AASHTO and the NCHRP are currently formulating new provisions for the seismic design of highway bridges. As a member of the AASHTO Seismic Design Sub-Committee (T-3), Illinois is playing an advisory role in the process. A vote by AASHTO members on adoption of these provisions into the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications or as guide specifications, in part or in full, could come in the late spring of 2007 with initial publication as early as 2008. The proposed formulation of the new provisions is quite different than those in the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications as well as the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. There are two key aspects of differentiation between the current codified provisions and the proposed which Illinois is focusing on for implementation. The design earthquake return period is increasing from 500 to 1000 years and the newly formulated method for seismic analysis and design is primarily “displacement based” as opposed to the current “force based” or “R-factor” approach. Illinois has already begun to lay the foundation for implementation of these expected provisions. The paper presents an overview of these efforts.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Engineering, Seismic analysis, Foundation (evidence), Civil engineering, Forensic engineering, Transport engineering, Construction engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implications of Future Seismic Bridge Design Provisions for Illinois — Research Paper | ScholarLens