2003•Elsevier eBooksRequires access

Update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium

R. Guillaumont, F. J. Mompeán

Open publisher page 949 citations

Abstract

Preface Acknowledgement Note from the chairman of the NEA TDB Project Phase II Editor's note Part I. Introductory material 1. Introduction 2. Standards, conventions and contents of tables Part II. Tables of selected data 3. Selected data for uranium 4. Selected data for neptunium 5. Selected data for plutonium 6. Selected data for americium 7. Selected data for technetium 8. Selected auxiliary data Part III. Discussion of new data selection 9. Discussion of new data selection for uranium 10. Discussion of new data selection for neptunium 11. Discussion of new data selection for plutonium 12. Discussion of new data selection for americium 13. Discussion of new data selection for technetium 14. Discussion of new auxiliary data selection Part IV. Appendices A. Discussion of selected references B. Ionic strength corrections C. Assigned uncertainties D. Some limitations encountered in the use of the ionic strength correction procedures

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preface Acknowledgement Note from the chairman of the NEA TDB Project Phase II Editor's note Part I. Introductory material 1. Introduction 2. Standards, conventions and contents of tables Part II. Tables of selected data 3. Selected data for uranium 4. Selected data for neptunium 5. Selected data for plutonium 6. Selected data for americium 7. Selected data for technetium 8. Selected auxiliary data Part III. Discussion of new data selection 9. Discussion of new data selection for uranium 10. Discussion of new data selection for neptunium 11. Discussion of new data selection for plutonium 12. Discussion of new data selection for americium 13. Discussion of new data selection for technetium 14. Discussion of new auxiliary data selection Part IV. Appendices A. Discussion of selected references B. Ionic strength corrections C. Assigned uncertainties D. Some limitations encountered in the use of the ionic strength correction procedures

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 949 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preface Acknowledgement Note from the chairman of the NEA TDB Project Phase II Editor's note Part I. Introductory material 1. Introduction 2. Standards, conventions and contents of tables Part II. Tables of selected data 3. Selected data for uranium 4. Selected data for neptunium 5. Selected data for plutonium 6. Selected data for americium 7. Selected data for technetium 8. Selected auxiliary data Part III. Discussion of new data selection 9. Discussion of new data selection for uranium 10. Discussion of new data selection for neptunium 11. Discussion of new data selection for plutonium 12. Discussion of new data selection for americium 13. Discussion of new data selection for technetium 14. Discussion of new auxiliary data selection Part IV. Appendices A. Discussion of selected references B. Ionic strength corrections C. Assigned uncertainties D. Some limitations encountered in the use of the ionic strength correction procedures

Key concepts: Neptunium, Americium, Plutonium, Curium, Nuclear data, Transuranium element, Actinide, Uranium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium — Research Paper | ScholarLens