2005Railway ageRequires access

What Next for Amtrak

William C Vantuono

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article looks at the debate over the future of Amtrak and intercity rail by citing concerns expressed by attendees at the 12th annual Passenger Trains on Freight Railroads Conference. Competitive procurement advocated by U.S. Department of Transportation has caused the freight railroaders to fear that it would mean extending access rights to non-Amtrak entities. Further issues include the apparent lack of coordination within the federal transportation bureaucracy over the degree and type of federal support for the railroad. Concerns were expressed regarding radical ideas for restructuring Amtrak without the capital investment to back it up. Attendees warned against divisive partisan proposals that would weaken the alliance Amtrak supporters have forged with freight operators. The House and Senate approved $1.17 billion and $1.45 billion, respectively, for Amtrak in fiscal 2006. The amounts will be reconciled in conference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article looks at the debate over the future of Amtrak and intercity rail by citing concerns expressed by attendees at the 12th annual Passenger Trains on Freight Railroads Conference. Competitive procurement advocated by U.S. Department of Transportation has caused the freight railroaders to fear that it would mean extending access rights to non-Amtrak entities. Further issues include the apparent lack of coordination within the federal transportation bureaucracy over the degree and type of federal support for the railroad. Concerns were expressed regarding radical ideas for restructuring Amtrak without the capital investment to back it up. Attendees warned against divisive partisan proposals that would weaken the alliance Amtrak supporters have forged with freight operators. The House and Senate approved $1.17 billion and $1.45 billion, respectively, for Amtrak in fiscal 2006. The amounts will be reconciled in conference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article looks at the debate over the future of Amtrak and intercity rail by citing concerns expressed by attendees at the 12th annual Passenger Trains on Freight Railroads Conference. Competitive procurement advocated by U.S. Department of Transportation has caused the freight railroaders to fear that it would mean extending access rights to non-Amtrak entities. Further issues include the apparent lack of coordination within the federal transportation bureaucracy over the degree and type of federal support for the railroad. Concerns were expressed regarding radical ideas for restructuring Amtrak without the capital investment to back it up. Attendees warned against divisive partisan proposals that would weaken the alliance Amtrak supporters have forged with freight operators. The House and Senate approved $1.17 billion and $1.45 billion, respectively, for Amtrak in fiscal 2006. The amounts will be reconciled in conference.

Key concepts: Restructuring, Bureaucracy, Train, Procurement, Investment (military), Alliance, Capital investment, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Next for Amtrak — Research Paper | ScholarLens