1997Community TransportationRequires access

EYEING THE SECTION 18[I] SET-ASIDE

Scott Bogren

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since its inception in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the Section 18[i] program has spurred heated debate among community transportation professionals. Some see intercity bus companies stealing funding from already underfunded rural public transportation providers, while others see a vital program designed to connect rural America with metropolitan areas. The original impetus for the program was rapidly declining intercity bus service, which led directly to rural areas becoming disconnected from the nearest metropolitan areas. The article looks at costs vs. benefits, and concludes that there are not enough transportation resources in rural areas, and intercity bus service is a crucial component of providing mobility in those areas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since its inception in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the Section 18[i] program has spurred heated debate among community transportation professionals. Some see intercity bus companies stealing funding from already underfunded rural public transportation providers, while others see a vital program designed to connect rural America with metropolitan areas. The original impetus for the program was rapidly declining intercity bus service, which led directly to rural areas becoming disconnected from the nearest metropolitan areas. The article looks at costs vs. benefits, and concludes that there are not enough transportation resources in rural areas, and intercity bus service is a crucial component of providing mobility in those areas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since its inception in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the Section 18[i] program has spurred heated debate among community transportation professionals. Some see intercity bus companies stealing funding from already underfunded rural public transportation providers, while others see a vital program designed to connect rural America with metropolitan areas. The original impetus for the program was rapidly declining intercity bus service, which led directly to rural areas becoming disconnected from the nearest metropolitan areas. The article looks at costs vs. benefits, and concludes that there are not enough transportation resources in rural areas, and intercity bus service is a crucial component of providing mobility in those areas.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Public transport, Transport engineering, Business, Service (business), Rural area, Economic growth, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EYEING THE SECTION 18[I] SET-ASIDE — Research Paper | ScholarLens