2007Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

The Potential of Vehicle Mileage Road User Fee as Alternate Financing Option for State Highways

Virginia P. Sisiopiku, Johnnie C Waid

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Building and maintaining an effective highway system is extremely important to the quality of life of the citizens and the local economy. Projections of decreased revenue for highways in many states come at a time when current revenue sources are already strained. This creates a need for innovative ways to be considered to secure funding for highway projects. As a case study, this paper investigates current and future options for financing highway-related projects in the state of Alabama. Currently, approximately 70 percent of income for Alabama’s Highway Fund is generated through the gasoline and motor fuels taxes. However, changes to the present system may be required to account for the increase in fuel efficient vehicles on Alabama’s roadways. As the number of these vehicles increases, revenue collected by the state from gas taxes is expected to decrease, which may further hinder the ability of the state to finance the construction or maintenance of roadways. Therefore, it is imperative that the state identifies, evaluates, and adopts alternative financing solutions to ensure sustainability of highway funding. The objective of this research is to determine alternative and innovative solutions to fund Alabama’s highways in the near- and long terms. In this paper, the vehicle mileage road user fee is evaluated as an alternative revenue source, based on its revenue potential, equity, efficiency, and political acceptability to the tax payers and decision makers in Alabama. The findings from the case study can be very useful to local officials as well as to decision makers in other states that are seeking alternative sources of highway financing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Building and maintaining an effective highway system is extremely important to the quality of life of the citizens and the local economy. Projections of decreased revenue for highways in many states come at a time when current revenue sources are already strained. This creates a need for innovative ways to be considered to secure funding for highway projects. As a case study, this paper investigates current and future options for financing highway-related projects in the state of Alabama. Currently, approximately 70 percent of income for Alabama’s Highway Fund is generated through the gasoline and motor fuels taxes. However, changes to the present system may be required to account for the increase in fuel efficient vehicles on Alabama’s roadways. As the number of these vehicles increases, revenue collected by the state from gas taxes is expected to decrease, which may further hinder the ability of the state to finance the construction or maintenance of roadways. Therefore, it is imperative that the state identifies, evaluates, and adopts alternative financing solutions to ensure sustainability of highway funding. The objective of this research is to determine alternative and innovative solutions to fund Alabama’s highways in the near- and long terms. In this paper, the vehicle mileage road user fee is evaluated as an alternative revenue source, based on its revenue potential, equity, efficiency, and political acceptability to the tax payers and decision makers in Alabama. The findings from the case study can be very useful to local officials as well as to decision makers in other states that are seeking alternative sources of highway financing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Building and maintaining an effective highway system is extremely important to the quality of life of the citizens and the local economy. Projections of decreased revenue for highways in many states come at a time when current revenue sources are already strained. This creates a need for innovative ways to be considered to secure funding for highway projects. As a case study, this paper investigates current and future options for financing highway-related projects in the state of Alabama. Currently, approximately 70 percent of income for Alabama’s Highway Fund is generated through the gasoline and motor fuels taxes. However, changes to the present system may be required to account for the increase in fuel efficient vehicles on Alabama’s roadways. As the number of these vehicles increases, revenue collected by the state from gas taxes is expected to decrease, which may further hinder the ability of the state to finance the construction or maintenance of roadways. Therefore, it is imperative that the state identifies, evaluates, and adopts alternative financing solutions to ensure sustainability of highway funding. The objective of this research is to determine alternative and innovative solutions to fund Alabama’s highways in the near- and long terms. In this paper, the vehicle mileage road user fee is evaluated as an alternative revenue source, based on its revenue potential, equity, efficiency, and political acceptability to the tax payers and decision makers in Alabama. The findings from the case study can be very useful to local officials as well as to decision makers in other states that are seeking alternative sources of highway financing.

Key concepts: Revenue, Finance, Fuel tax, Business, User fee, Equity (law), Innovative financing, Alternative fuel vehicle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Potential of Vehicle Mileage Road User Fee as Alternate Financing Option for State Highways — Research Paper | ScholarLens