Defining Driver Distraction
Michael Pettitt, Gary Burnett, Alan Stevens
Abstract
Michael Pettitt, Gary Burnett, Alan Stevens
Abstract
This paper discusses the various issues concerned with the precise definition of the term driver distraction. There has been growing interest in driver distraction in the research community due to the development of information and communication technologies for concurrent use whilst driving. Concern has been raised that such technologies may lead to an increase in accidents. In order to reliably monitor the driver distraction problem it is essential that cross study comparisons can be made. This is made difficult due to the lack of a comprehensive definition of the term. This paper reviews those definitions available in the literature and examines the necessary components of a reliable definition with support from accident statistics in a database of work-related road traffic accidents in the Midlands area of the UK. It is found that driver distraction should be discussed in terms of four components: the difference between distraction and inattention; the recognition that distraction can be internal and external to the vehicle; that distraction can be categorized into four types; and, the effect of distraction on the driving task. Finally, a proposed, comprehensive definition for driver distraction is provided along with other conclusions.
OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper discusses the various issues concerned with the precise definition of the term driver distraction. There has been growing interest in driver distraction in the research community due to the development of information and communication technologies for concurrent use whilst driving. Concern has been raised that such technologies may lead to an increase in accidents. In order to reliably monitor the driver distraction problem it is essential that cross study comparisons can be made. This is made difficult due to the lack of a comprehensive definition of the term. This paper reviews those definitions available in the literature and examines the necessary components of a reliable definition with support from accident statistics in a database of work-related road traffic accidents in the Midlands area of the UK. It is found that driver distraction should be discussed in terms of four components: the difference between distraction and inattention; the recognition that distraction can be internal and external to the vehicle; that distraction can be categorized into four types; and, the effect of distraction on the driving task. Finally, a proposed, comprehensive definition for driver distraction is provided along with other conclusions.
Key concepts: Distraction, Task (project management), Computer science, Work (physics), Poison control, Computer security, Risk analysis (engineering), Engineering