1987Unpublished venueRequires access

APPROACHES TO TRANSPORT POLICY - TWO EXAMPLES FROM LONDON ---TRANSPORT POLICY. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR A HELD AT THE PTRC TRANSPORT AND PLANNING SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, UNIVERSITY OF BATH, ENGLAND 7-11 SEPTEMBER 1987. VOLUME P288

Steve Atkins

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the merits of two contrasting approaches to policies for London. The first is the goals-based policy assessment format first set out by the group of the strategic policy unit (lspu) in their document transport policies for London (tpl) in 1986. The second is the very different approach taken by the Department of Transport and their consultants in the corridor assessment studies which were published recently. The establishment, status and remit of the group of lspu is briefly described and the purpose of the tpl document explained. The innovative nature of the goals-based approach is presented; one which sees policy as an intimate part of broader social, economic and land-use planning policies. Thus the importance of policies as part of a range of tools being used to tackle issues such as unemployment, poverty, equality of opportunity and community security is stressed. The context of the assessment studies is then described and the alternative approach of problem identification used in these studies is presented. Some variations between the four studies are noted, and the methods or establishing perceived and measured problems are reviewed.(a) for the covering abstract of the seminar see IRRD 816535.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper considers the merits of two contrasting approaches to policies for London. The first is the goals-based policy assessment format first set out by the group of the strategic policy unit (lspu) in their document transport policies for London (tpl) in 1986. The second is the very different approach taken by the Department of Transport and their consultants in the corridor assessment studies which were published recently. The establishment, status and remit of the group of lspu is briefly described and the purpose of the tpl document explained. The innovative nature of the goals-based approach is presented; one which sees policy as an intimate part of broader social, economic and land-use planning policies. Thus the importance of policies as part of a range of tools being used to tackle issues such as unemployment, poverty, equality of opportunity and community security is stressed. The context of the assessment studies is then described and the alternative approach of problem identification used in these studies is presented. Some variations between the four studies are noted, and the methods or establishing perceived and measured problems are reviewed.(a) for the covering abstract of the seminar see IRRD 816535.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper considers the merits of two contrasting approaches to policies for London. The first is the goals-based policy assessment format first set out by the group of the strategic policy unit (lspu) in their document transport policies for London (tpl) in 1986. The second is the very different approach taken by the Department of Transport and their consultants in the corridor assessment studies which were published recently. The establishment, status and remit of the group of lspu is briefly described and the purpose of the tpl document explained. The innovative nature of the goals-based approach is presented; one which sees policy as an intimate part of broader social, economic and land-use planning policies. Thus the importance of policies as part of a range of tools being used to tackle issues such as unemployment, poverty, equality of opportunity and community security is stressed. The context of the assessment studies is then described and the alternative approach of problem identification used in these studies is presented. Some variations between the four studies are noted, and the methods or establishing perceived and measured problems are reviewed.(a) for the covering abstract of the seminar see IRRD 816535.

Key concepts: Context (archaeology), Public administration, Identification (biology), Transport policy, Unemployment, Transportation planning, Unit (ring theory), Poverty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
APPROACHES TO TRANSPORT POLICY - TWO EXAMPLES FROM LONDON ---TRANSPORT POLICY. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR A HELD AT THE PTRC TRANSPORT AND PLANNING SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, UNIVERSITY OF BATH, ENGLAND 7-11 SEPTEMBER 1987. VOLUME P288 — Research Paper | ScholarLens