1971Unpublished venueRequires access

DETAILED PROGRAM PLANS FOR THE CONCENTRATED IMPLEMENTATION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES. FINAL REPORT

Jennifer O’Day, J S Creswell, J A Green, M E Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ALTHOUGH THE 16 HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM STANDARDS HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT FOR SOME TIME, THEIR ADOPTION BY THE INDIVIDUAL STATES HAS BEEN LESS THAN COMPLETE. TO CONVINCE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THESE STANDARDS ARE WELL WORTH THEIR COST IN IMPROVED SAFETY BENEFITS, A NEED EXISTS FOR DETERMINING AND RANKING THE EFFICACY OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES. THE RESULTS OF A ONE-YEAR STUDY TO DETERMINE A PROGRAM PLANNING METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES ARE COVERED. PROGRAM PLANS FOR EACH OF THE SIX EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PRESENTED. EXPERIMENTS INCLUDE: (1) ROAD USER REGULATION; (2) INFORMATION FLOW; (3) ROAD USER PREPARATION; (4) VEHICLE REGULATION; (5) SYSTEM RESTORATION; AND (6) HIGHWAY REGULATION. /HSRI/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ALTHOUGH THE 16 HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM STANDARDS HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT FOR SOME TIME, THEIR ADOPTION BY THE INDIVIDUAL STATES HAS BEEN LESS THAN COMPLETE. TO CONVINCE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THESE STANDARDS ARE WELL WORTH THEIR COST IN IMPROVED SAFETY BENEFITS, A NEED EXISTS FOR DETERMINING AND RANKING THE EFFICACY OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES. THE RESULTS OF A ONE-YEAR STUDY TO DETERMINE A PROGRAM PLANNING METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES ARE COVERED. PROGRAM PLANS FOR EACH OF THE SIX EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PRESENTED. EXPERIMENTS INCLUDE: (1) ROAD USER REGULATION; (2) INFORMATION FLOW; (3) ROAD USER PREPARATION; (4) VEHICLE REGULATION; (5) SYSTEM RESTORATION; AND (6) HIGHWAY REGULATION. /HSRI/

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ALTHOUGH THE 16 HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM STANDARDS HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT FOR SOME TIME, THEIR ADOPTION BY THE INDIVIDUAL STATES HAS BEEN LESS THAN COMPLETE. TO CONVINCE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THESE STANDARDS ARE WELL WORTH THEIR COST IN IMPROVED SAFETY BENEFITS, A NEED EXISTS FOR DETERMINING AND RANKING THE EFFICACY OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES. THE RESULTS OF A ONE-YEAR STUDY TO DETERMINE A PROGRAM PLANNING METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES ARE COVERED. PROGRAM PLANS FOR EACH OF THE SIX EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PRESENTED. EXPERIMENTS INCLUDE: (1) ROAD USER REGULATION; (2) INFORMATION FLOW; (3) ROAD USER PREPARATION; (4) VEHICLE REGULATION; (5) SYSTEM RESTORATION; AND (6) HIGHWAY REGULATION. /HSRI/

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Ranking (information retrieval), Safety standards, Risk analysis (engineering), Engineering, Business, Computer science, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DETAILED PROGRAM PLANS FOR THE CONCENTRATED IMPLEMENTATION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens