1991Transportation research circularRequires access

EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION CHOICES. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP, MAY 28-31, 1990, DES MOINES, IOWA

A T Swenson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As capital budgets continue to come under closer scrutiny and tighter spending reduction pressures, individual agencies and public officials often are faced with having to use alternative equipment acquisition methods to secure needed machines for key maintenance operations. There are many choices offered today for acquiring machines. All of these different choices, however, can normally be grouped into one of six common categories of equipment acquisition methods. These six categories, which are examined in this paper, are: renting; leasing; cash purchasing; lease purchasing; cash purchasing with trade or buy-back guarantee; and any of the above methods combined with a guarantee of repair, parts, labor, and/or maintenance costs. When considering the six basic acquisition methods, it is sometimes helpful to look at their relative, bottom-line costs. The acquisition of a 2.5 cu yd wheel loader is used to illustrate a typical acquisition cost analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As capital budgets continue to come under closer scrutiny and tighter spending reduction pressures, individual agencies and public officials often are faced with having to use alternative equipment acquisition methods to secure needed machines for key maintenance operations. There are many choices offered today for acquiring machines. All of these different choices, however, can normally be grouped into one of six common categories of equipment acquisition methods. These six categories, which are examined in this paper, are: renting; leasing; cash purchasing; lease purchasing; cash purchasing with trade or buy-back guarantee; and any of the above methods combined with a guarantee of repair, parts, labor, and/or maintenance costs. When considering the six basic acquisition methods, it is sometimes helpful to look at their relative, bottom-line costs. The acquisition of a 2.5 cu yd wheel loader is used to illustrate a typical acquisition cost analysis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As capital budgets continue to come under closer scrutiny and tighter spending reduction pressures, individual agencies and public officials often are faced with having to use alternative equipment acquisition methods to secure needed machines for key maintenance operations. There are many choices offered today for acquiring machines. All of these different choices, however, can normally be grouped into one of six common categories of equipment acquisition methods. These six categories, which are examined in this paper, are: renting; leasing; cash purchasing; lease purchasing; cash purchasing with trade or buy-back guarantee; and any of the above methods combined with a guarantee of repair, parts, labor, and/or maintenance costs. When considering the six basic acquisition methods, it is sometimes helpful to look at their relative, bottom-line costs. The acquisition of a 2.5 cu yd wheel loader is used to illustrate a typical acquisition cost analysis.

Key concepts: Purchasing, Renting, Lease, Capital equipment, Cash, Resource Acquisition Is Initialization, Business, Capital expenditure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION CHOICES. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP, MAY 28-31, 1990, DES MOINES, IOWA — Research Paper | ScholarLens