2012Choice Reviews OnlineRequires access

Supreme myths: why the Supreme Court is not a court and its justices are not judges

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

This book explores some of the most glaring misunderstandings about the U.S. Supreme Court-and makes strong case for why our Supreme Court Justices should not be entrusted with decisions that affect every American citizen. Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not Court and its Justices are Not Judges presents detailed discussion of the Court's most important and controversial constitutional cases that demonstrates why it doesn't justify being labeled a court of Eric Segall, professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law for two decades, explains why this third branch of the national government is an institution that makes important judgments about fundamental questions based on the Justices' ideological preferences, not the law. A complete understanding of the true nature of the Court's decision-making process is necessary, he argues, before an intelligent debate over who should serve on the Court-and how they should resolve cases-can be held. Addressing front-page areas of constitutional law such as health care, abortion, affirmative action, gun control, and freedom of religion, this book offers frank description of how the Supreme Court truly operates, critique of life tenure of its Justices, and set of proposals aimed at making the Court function more transparently to further the goals of our representative democracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This book explores some of the most glaring misunderstandings about the U.S. Supreme Court-and makes strong case for why our Supreme Court Justices should not be entrusted with decisions that affect every American citizen. Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not Court and its Justices are Not Judges presents detailed discussion of the Court's most important and controversial constitutional cases that demonstrates why it doesn't justify being labeled a court of Eric Segall, professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law for two decades, explains why this third branch of the national government is an institution that makes important judgments about fundamental questions based on the Justices' ideological preferences, not the law. A complete understanding of the true nature of the Court's decision-making process is necessary, he argues, before an intelligent debate over who should serve on the Court-and how they should resolve cases-can be held. Addressing front-page areas of constitutional law such as health care, abortion, affirmative action, gun control, and freedom of religion, this book offers frank description of how the Supreme Court truly operates, critique of life tenure of its Justices, and set of proposals aimed at making the Court function more transparently to further the goals of our representative democracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This book explores some of the most glaring misunderstandings about the U.S. Supreme Court-and makes strong case for why our Supreme Court Justices should not be entrusted with decisions that affect every American citizen. Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not Court and its Justices are Not Judges presents detailed discussion of the Court's most important and controversial constitutional cases that demonstrates why it doesn't justify being labeled a court of Eric Segall, professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law for two decades, explains why this third branch of the national government is an institution that makes important judgments about fundamental questions based on the Justices' ideological preferences, not the law. A complete understanding of the true nature of the Court's decision-making process is necessary, he argues, before an intelligent debate over who should serve on the Court-and how they should resolve cases-can be held. Addressing front-page areas of constitutional law such as health care, abortion, affirmative action, gun control, and freedom of religion, this book offers frank description of how the Supreme Court truly operates, critique of life tenure of its Justices, and set of proposals aimed at making the Court function more transparently to further the goals of our representative democracy.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Mythology, Political science, Majority opinion, Concurring opinion, Remand (court procedure), Original jurisdiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supreme myths: why the Supreme Court is not a court and its justices are not judges — Research Paper | ScholarLens