1973Medical Entomology and ZoologyRequires access

The Second Newman report;: National policy and higher education;

Frank Newman

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

In the 1950s and 1960s, the right to became an assumption for an ever greater number of Americans. This book documents the changeover from an aristocratic and meritocratic view of to an egalitarian view, more accurately reflecting the current status of American society.Since the end of World War II, there has been a rapid increase in the amount of federal aid given to education. In the 1970s educators and federal policy makers have, however, come to realize that massive spending and an emphasis on widening access alone will not solve the basic problems of the quality and variety of educational opportunities that are available to the larger and more diverse group of people now seeking education. At the same time, there has been a switch in emphasis from the narrow concept of higher education (including colleges and universities only) to a broader concept of education (including all modes of beyond the high school level, such as community colleges, proprietary schools, in-house industrial programs, adult courses).Citing such areas of concern as the decline in enrollment of private institutions, the swelling of public university enrollments, the creation of multi-campus-system bureaucracies with their tendency to breed other bureaucracies and an assembly-line educational process, and the changing meaning of a in terms of economic and social mobility, this book concludes that now is the time to reexamine our concepts of the structure and purpose of so that we can more realistically design federal involvement.The Task Force makes several recommendations, including more use of direct grants to students; the book concludes that is to the country's advantage to encourage a more open system of postsecondary education. We have favored openness and competition because we believe it will lead to both a more effective and a more efficient system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the 1950s and 1960s, the right to became an assumption for an ever greater number of Americans. This book documents the changeover from an aristocratic and meritocratic view of to an egalitarian view, more accurately reflecting the current status of American society.Since the end of World War II, there has been a rapid increase in the amount of federal aid given to education. In the 1970s educators and federal policy makers have, however, come to realize that massive spending and an emphasis on widening access alone will not solve the basic problems of the quality and variety of educational opportunities that are available to the larger and more diverse group of people now seeking education. At the same time, there has been a switch in emphasis from the narrow concept of higher education (including colleges and universities only) to a broader concept of education (including all modes of beyond the high school level, such as community colleges, proprietary schools, in-house industrial programs, adult courses).Citing such areas of concern as the decline in enrollment of private institutions, the swelling of public university enrollments, the creation of multi-campus-system bureaucracies with their tendency to breed other bureaucracies and an assembly-line educational process, and the changing meaning of a in terms of economic and social mobility, this book concludes that now is the time to reexamine our concepts of the structure and purpose of so that we can more realistically design federal involvement.The Task Force makes several recommendations, including more use of direct grants to students; the book concludes that is to the country's advantage to encourage a more open system of postsecondary education. We have favored openness and competition because we believe it will lead to both a more effective and a more efficient system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the 1950s and 1960s, the right to became an assumption for an ever greater number of Americans. This book documents the changeover from an aristocratic and meritocratic view of to an egalitarian view, more accurately reflecting the current status of American society.Since the end of World War II, there has been a rapid increase in the amount of federal aid given to education. In the 1970s educators and federal policy makers have, however, come to realize that massive spending and an emphasis on widening access alone will not solve the basic problems of the quality and variety of educational opportunities that are available to the larger and more diverse group of people now seeking education. At the same time, there has been a switch in emphasis from the narrow concept of higher education (including colleges and universities only) to a broader concept of education (including all modes of beyond the high school level, such as community colleges, proprietary schools, in-house industrial programs, adult courses).Citing such areas of concern as the decline in enrollment of private institutions, the swelling of public university enrollments, the creation of multi-campus-system bureaucracies with their tendency to breed other bureaucracies and an assembly-line educational process, and the changing meaning of a in terms of economic and social mobility, this book concludes that now is the time to reexamine our concepts of the structure and purpose of so that we can more realistically design federal involvement.The Task Force makes several recommendations, including more use of direct grants to students; the book concludes that is to the country's advantage to encourage a more open system of postsecondary education. We have favored openness and competition because we believe it will lead to both a more effective and a more efficient system.

Key concepts: Bureaucracy, Meritocracy, Political science, Variety (cybernetics), Meaning (existential), Public administration, Higher education, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Second Newman report;: National policy and higher education; — Research Paper | ScholarLens